SkinCeuticals Advanced Brightening UV Defense Sunscreen SPF 50 and Lancome Rénergie HPN Uvmune Cream Spf 50 50 Ml share 12 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 12SkinCeuticals Advanced Brightening UV Defense Sunscreen SPF 50 only 20Lancome Rénergie HPN Uvmune Cream Spf 50 50 Ml only 31
Permalink for this comparison →
19%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Sunscreen · size not on the record | Sunscreen · size not on the record |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Availabilitydiffers | Not recorded | in stock |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | niacinamide, tranexamic acid | niacinamide |
| Free ofdiffers | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, paraben-free | sulfate-free, paraben-free |
| Heads-updiffers | pregnancy caution · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed | fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 32 ingredients | Fully parsed · 43 ingredients |
Key actives · 1 | ||
tranexamic acid | yes | no |
Rest of the labels · 50 | ||
adenosine | no | yes |
aluminum starch octenylsuccinate | no | yes |
behenyl alcohol | no | yes |
butylene glycol | yes | no |
c12-15 alkyl benzoate | no | yes |
caprylyl glycol | yes | no |
carbomer | yes | no |
cetearyl alcohol | yes | no |
cetearyl glucoside | yes | no |
ci 17200 | no | yes |
ci 77891 | yes | no |
cyclodextrin | no | yes |
diisopropyl adipate | no | yes |
dipropylene glycol | no | yes |
ethylhexyl salicylate | yes | no |
fragrance | no | yes |
glycerin | yes | no |
glyceryl stearate | no | yes |
hydrolyzed linseed extract | no | yes |
hydrolyzed lupine protein | no | yes |
inulin lauryl carbamate | yes | no |
isononyl isononanoate | yes | no |
isopropyl lauroyl sarcosinate | yes | no |
lactobacillus ferment | no | yes |
methoxypropylamino cyclohexenylidene ethoxyethylcyanoacetate | no | yes |
mica | yes | no |
myristic acid | no | yes |
octocrylene | yes | no |
oryza sativa cera | no | yes |
palmitic acid | no | yes |
peg-10 dimethicone | yes | no |
peg-100 stearate | no | yes |
pentaerythrityl tetra-di-t-butyl hydroxyhydrocinnamate | no | yes |
pentylene glycol | no | yes |
pisum sativum extract | no | yes |
polyglyceryl-10 laurate | yes | no |
potassium cetyl phosphate | no | yes |
propanediol | yes | no |
propylene glycol | no | yes |
sodium acetylated hyaluronate | no | yes |
sodium benzoate | no | yes |
sodium chloride | no | yes |
sodium cocoyl sarcosinate | no | yes |
sodium polyacrylate | no | yes |
sodium stearoyl glutamate | yes | no |
stearic acid | no | yes |
t-butyl alcohol | yes | no |
triethanolamine | no | yes |
vitamin e | yes | no |
xanthan gum | no | yes |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose SkinCeuticals if you want Tranexamic Acid in the formula.
Choose Lancôme if you want this formula as listed.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.