ROVECTIN Calming Lotus Sun Cream SPF 50+ PA ++++ 50ml vs celimax Pore+ Dark Spot Brightening Care Sunscreen SPF 50+ PA++++ (50ml / 1.69 fl oz)

ROVECTIN Calming Lotus Sun Cream SPF 50+ PA ++++ 50ml and celimax Pore+ Dark Spot Brightening Care Sunscreen SPF 50+ PA++++ (50ml / 1.69 fl oz) share 21 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Shared 21ROVECTIN Calming Lotus Sun Cream SPF 50+ PA ++++ 50ml only 15celimax Pore+ Dark Spot Brightening Care Sunscreen SPF 50+ PA++++ (50ml / 1.69 fl oz) only 12

2 of 6

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

44%

Ingredients in every formula: 21in both formulas
Key actives unique to one formula: 2unique actives
Ingredient rows compared: 48rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

The formulas, row by row

48 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(27 of 48 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side
on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Rovectin ROVECTIN Calming Lotus Sun Cream SPF 50+ PA ++++ 50ml $18.58 $18.58 at Dodoskin ↗	Recommended Celimax celimax Pore+ Dark Spot Brightening Care Sunscreen SPF 50+ PA++++ (50ml / 1.69 fl oz) $8.45
Basics
Type & size	Sunscreen · size not on the record	Sunscreen · size not on the record
Brand origindiffers	Korean	Not recorded
Offers
Where to buydiffers	$18.58 · Dodoskin	Not recorded
Formula
Key activesdiffers	panthenol	niacinamide, tranexamic acid, panthenol
Free of	fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free	fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free
Heads-up	fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed	fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 36 ingredients	Fully parsed · 33 ingredients
Key actives · 2
tranexamic acid	no	yes
vitamin b3	no	yes
Rest of the labels · 25
angelica keiskei extract	yes	no
c12-15 alkyl benzoate	yes	no
carbomer	no	yes
cetearyl olivate	yes	no
citric acid	no	yes
coco-caprylate	no	yes
corchorus olitorius leaf extract	yes	no
diethylhexyl butamido triazone	no	yes
diisopropyl adipate	yes	no
diisopropyl sebacate	no	yes
dioscorea japonica root extract	yes	no
dipotassium glycyrrhizate	yes	no
dipropylene glycol	yes	no
disteardimonium hectorite	no	yes
eriobotrya japonica leaf extract	no	yes
hibiscus esculentus fruit extract	yes	no
hydrogenated lecithin	yes	no
hydroxyacetophenone	yes	no
hydroxyethyl urea	yes	no
nelumbo nucifera flower extract	yes	no
nelumbo nucifera root extract	yes	no
polyglyceryl-4 isostearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
quercetin	no	yes
sorbitan olivate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
vitamin e	no	yes

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Rovectin if you want this formula as listed.

Choose Celimax if you want Vitamin B3 in the formula.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spots Clear breakouts Smooth fine lines Hydrate & plump

Calm redness Refine texture Repair & strengthen Protect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.