Essential storage keeps the site working. Optional cookies and tracking support analytics, sampled session replay, error reports and affiliate tools.
Either choice lets you browse. Change it anytime in the footer. Cookie details.
Revlon, Super Lustrous™ Glass Shine, Lip Balm, 006 Girly Swirly, 0.11 oz (3.1 g) and wet n wild, PerfectPout Lip Treatment, Grapefruit & Mint, 0.21 oz (6 g) share 4 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 4Revlon, Super Lustrous™ Glass Shine, Lip Balm, 006 Girly Swirly, 0.11 oz (3.1 g) only 24wet n wild, PerfectPout Lip Treatment, Grapefruit & Mint, 0.21 oz (6 g) only 21
Permalink for this comparison →
Loading product details…
8%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | Recommended ![]() Revlon Revlon, Super Lustrous™ Glass Shine, Lip Balm, 006 Girly Swirly, 0.11 oz (3.1 g)$13.64 | ![]() wet n wild wet n wild, PerfectPout Lip Treatment, Grapefruit & Mint, 0.21 oz (6 g)$4.47 |
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Lip care · size not on the record | Lip care · size not on the record |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | No offers listed | No offers listed |
| Availability | No offers listed | No offers listed |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | sodium hyaluronate, titanium dioxide | titanium dioxide |
| Free ofdiffers | sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free | sulfate-free, paraben-free, silicone-free |
| Heads-updiffers | fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag | fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 28 ingredients | Fully parsed · 25 ingredients |
Key actives · 1 | ||
| yes | no | |
Rest of the labels · 44 | ||
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose Revlon if you want this formula as listed.
Choose wet n wild if you want a comparable formula for $9.17 less.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.