Ultimate Repair Conditioner - 245ml vs Paul Mitchell, Tea Tree®, Thickening Conditioner®, Lemon Sage, 10.14 fl oz (300 ml)

Ultimate Repair Conditioner - 245ml and Paul Mitchell, Tea Tree®, Thickening Conditioner®, Lemon Sage, 10.14 fl oz (300 ml) share 9 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Shared 9Ultimate Repair Conditioner - 245ml only 18Paul Mitchell, Tea Tree®, Thickening Conditioner®, Lemon Sage, 10.14 fl oz (300 ml) only 22

2 of 6

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

18%

Ingredients in every formula: 9in both formulas
Key actives unique to one formula: 0unique actives
Ingredient rows compared: 49rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

The formulas, row by row

49 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(40 of 49 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side
on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Recommended Ref Ultimate Repair Conditioner - 245ml $20.00	Paul Mitchell Paul Mitchell, Tea Tree®, Thickening Conditioner®, Lemon Sage, 10.14 fl oz (300 ml) $25.14
Basics
Type & size	Conditioner · size not on the record	Conditioner · size not on the record
Offers
Where to buy	Not recorded	Not recorded
Availability	in stock	in stock
Formula
Key actives	panthenol	panthenol
Free ofdiffers	sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free	sulfate-free, paraben-free
Heads-updiffers	fragrance allergensPore data not yet reviewed	fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 27 ingredients	Fully parsed · 31 ingredients
Rest of the labels · 40
a silicone	no	yes
alcohol	no	yes
amodimethicone	yes	no
astrocaryum murumuru seed butter	yes	no
behentrimonium chloride	yes	no
behentrimonium methosulfate	no	yes
butylene glycol	yes	no
cetrimonium chloride	yes	no
cetyl esters	yes	no
citral	yes	no
disodium edta	no	yes
disodium phosphate	no	yes
ethylhexylglycerin	yes	no
glycerin	yes	no
glyceryl stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
helianthus annuus seed extract	yes	no
hydrolyzed quinoa	yes	no
hydroxyethylcellulose	no	yes
linalool	yes	no
linum usitatissimum seed oil	yes	no
magnesium chloride	no	yes
magnesium nitrate	no	yes
methylchloroisothiazolinone	no	yes
methylisothiazolinone	no	yes
olealkonium chloride	no	yes
oleyl alcohol	no	yes
palmitoyl myristyl serinate	yes	no
panthenyl ethyl ether	no	yes
peg-2m	no	yes
peg-8	yes	no
phenoxyethanol	yes	no
propanediol	yes	no
sodium benzoate	no	yes
sodium hydroxide	no	yes
sodium phosphate	no	yes
sodium polyacrylate	yes	no
stearamidopropyl dimethylamine	no	yes
tetramethyl acetyloctahydronaphthalenes	no	yes
tridecane	no	yes
undecane	no	yes

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Ref if you want a comparable formula for $5.14 less.

Choose Paul Mitchell if you want this formula as listed.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spots Clear breakouts Smooth fine lines Hydrate & plump

Calm redness Refine texture Repair & strengthen Protect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.