Redken Extreme Strength Repairing Conditioning Mask 250ml vs Natura Siberica ICE Professional Keep My Blonde Regenerating mask for lightened hair, with cold blonde highlights 200 ml

Redken Extreme Strength Repairing Conditioning Mask 250ml and Natura Siberica ICE Professional Keep My Blonde Regenerating mask for lightened hair, with cold blonde highlights 200 ml share 10 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Shared 10Redken Extreme Strength Repairing Conditioning Mask 250ml only 23Natura Siberica ICE Professional Keep My Blonde Regenerating mask for lightened hair, with cold blonde highlights 200 ml only 13

2 of 6

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

22%

Ingredients in every formula: 10in both formulas
Key actives unique to one formula: 2unique actives
Ingredient rows compared: 46rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

The formulas, row by row

46 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(36 of 46 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side
on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Redken Redken Extreme Strength Repairing Conditioning Mask 250ml $66.00	Recommended Natura siberica Natura Siberica ICE Professional Keep My Blonde Regenerating mask for lightened hair, with cold blonde highlights 200 ml $45.00
Basics
Type & size	Mask · size not on the record	Mask · size not on the record
Offers
Where to buy	Not recorded	Not recorded
Availability	in stock	in stock
Formula
Key activesdiffers	lactic acid	sodium hyaluronate
Free ofdiffers	sulfate-free, paraben-free	sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free
Heads-updiffers	photosensitizing · fragrance allergensPore data not yet reviewed	pregnancy caution · fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 33 ingredients	Fully parsed · 23 ingredients
Key actives · 2
aha exfoliant (gentle)	yes	no
hyaluronic acid (salt form) Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
Rest of the labels · 34
2-oleamido-1,3-octadecanediol	yes	no
aminopropyl triethoxysilane	yes	no
amodimethicone	yes	no
behentrimonium methosulfate	yes	no
caprylyl glycol	yes	no
cetyl esters	yes	no
chlorhexidine digluconate	yes	no
coconut oil	no	yes
dipalmitoylethyl hydroxyethylmonium methosulfate	yes	no
ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate Pregnancy: caution	no	yes
glycerin	yes	no
guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chloride	no	yes
hydrogenated starch hydrolysate	no	yes
hydrolyzed soy protein	yes	no
hydrolyzed vegetable protein pg-propyl silanetriol	yes	no
iris sibirica root extract	no	yes
isopropyl alcohol	yes	no
lauryl glucoside	no	yes
limonene	yes	no
malva sylvestris flower extract	no	yes
octyldodecanol	yes	no
paraffinum liquidum	yes	no
phenyl trimethicone	no	yes
potassium dimethicone peg-7 panthenyl phosphate	yes	no
potassium sorbate	yes	no
propylene glycol	yes	no
ribes nigrum leaf water	no	yes
sodium chloride	yes	no
sodium cocoyl amino acids	yes	no
sodium sarcosinate	yes	no
sorbic acid	no	yes
tetrasodium edta	yes	no
tocopheryl acetate	no	yes
vaccinium myrtillus fruit extract	no	yes

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Redken if you want AHA exfoliant (gentle) in the formula.

Choose Natura siberica if you want a comparable formula for $21.00 less.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spots Clear breakouts Smooth fine lines Hydrate & plump

Calm redness Refine texture Repair & strengthen Protect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.