Redken Concentrated Acidifying Conditioner 1000 ml vs Luseta Beauty, Rosemary Mint Complex, Strengthening Conditioner, For All Hair Types, 16.9 fl oz (500 ml)

Redken Concentrated Acidifying Conditioner 1000 ml and Luseta Beauty, Rosemary Mint Complex, Strengthening Conditioner, For All Hair Types, 16.9 fl oz (500 ml) share 8 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Shared 8Redken Concentrated Acidifying Conditioner 1000 ml only 17Luseta Beauty, Rosemary Mint Complex, Strengthening Conditioner, For All Hair Types, 16.9 fl oz (500 ml) only 18

2 of 6

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

19%

Ingredients in every formula: 8in both formulas
Key actives unique to one formula: 1unique active
Ingredient rows compared: 43rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

The formulas, row by row

43 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(35 of 43 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side
on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Redken Redken Concentrated Acidifying Conditioner 1000 ml $151.00	Recommended Luseta Beauty Luseta Beauty, Rosemary Mint Complex, Strengthening Conditioner, For All Hair Types, 16.9 fl oz (500 ml) $12.40
Basics
Type & size	Conditioner · size not on the record	Conditioner · size not on the record
Offers
Where to buy	Not recorded	Not recorded
Availability	in stock	in stock
Formula
Key activesdiffers	Not recorded	argania spinosa kernel oil
Free of	sulfate-free, paraben-free	sulfate-free, paraben-free
Heads-updiffers	fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag	fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 25 ingredients	Fully parsed · 26 ingredients
Key actives · 1
argan oil	no	yes
Rest of the labels · 34
1,2-hexanediol	no	yes
alcohol	no	yes
behentrimonium chloride	yes	no
biotin	no	yes
bis-cetearyl amodimethicone	yes	no
butylene glycol	no	yes
candelilla cera	yes	no
ceteardimonium chloride	no	yes
cetyl esters	yes	no
citronellol	yes	no
cocamidopropyl betaine	no	yes
coco-betaine	yes	no
dicetyldimonium chloride	yes	no
dilauryl thiodipropionate	yes	no
disodium phosphate	no	yes
helianthus annuus seed oil	no	yes
hydroxyacetophenone	no	yes
hydroxyethylcellulose	no	yes
hydroxypropyl guar	yes	no
isopropyl alcohol	yes	no
isopropyl myristate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
limonene	yes	no
linalool	yes	no
mentha piperita oil	no	yes
peg-100 stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
rosmarinus officinalis leaf extract	no	yes
rubus idaeus seed oil	no	yes
sodium benzoate	no	yes
sodium citrate	yes	no
sodium phosphate	no	yes
steareth-6	yes	no
tripeptide-1	no	yes
water	yes	no
water	no	yes

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Redken if you want this formula as listed.

Choose Luseta Beauty if you want Argan oil in the formula.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spots Clear breakouts Smooth fine lines Hydrate & plump

Calm redness Refine texture Repair & strengthen Protect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.