RAWQUEST Milk Thistle Brightening SPA Cleansing Foam 150ml vs SKIN1004 Poremizing Deep Cleansing Foam 125ml

RAWQUEST Milk Thistle Brightening SPA Cleansing Foam 150ml and SKIN1004 Poremizing Deep Cleansing Foam 125ml share 15 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Shared 15RAWQUEST Milk Thistle Brightening SPA Cleansing Foam 150ml only 17SKIN1004 Poremizing Deep Cleansing Foam 125ml only 20

2 of 6

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

29%

Ingredients in every formula: 15in both formulas
Key actives unique to one formula: 1unique active
Ingredient rows compared: 52rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

The formulas, row by row

52 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(37 of 52 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side
on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Rawquest RAWQUEST Milk Thistle Brightening SPA Cleansing Foam 150ml $31.72	Recommended SKIN1004 SKIN1004 Poremizing Deep Cleansing Foam 125ml $56.00 $12.60 at Skin1004 ↗
Basics
Type & size	Cleanser · size not on the record	Cleanser · size not on the record
Brand origindiffers	Not recorded	Korean
Offers
Where to buydiffers	Not recorded	$12.60 · Skin1004
Formula
Key activesdiffers	Not recorded	centella asiatica extract
Free of	fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free	fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free
Heads-up	fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag	fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 32 ingredients	Fully parsed · 35 ingredients
Key actives · 1
cica	no	yes
Rest of the labels · 36
1,2-hexanediol	no	yes
acetyl glutamine	yes	no
aloe barbadensis leaf extract	no	yes
bambusa arundinacea stem powder	yes	no
camellia sinensis leaf extract	yes	no
canadian colloidal clay	yes	no
cellulose gum	yes	no
cetearyl alcohol	no	yes
citric acid	no	yes
coccinia indica fruit extract	no	yes
coptis japonica rhizome extract	yes	no
dextrin	yes	no
dipotassium phosphate	yes	no
eclipta prostrata extract	no	yes
fragaria chiloensis fruit extract	yes	no
glucose	no	yes
hydrogenated polydecene	no	yes
mineral salts	no	yes
pimpinella anisum fruit extract	yes	no
pinus palustris leaf extract	no	yes
potassium benzoate	no	yes
potassium cocoyl glycinate	yes	no
propanediol	no	yes
pueraria lobata root extract	no	yes
pyrus communis fruit extract	yes	no
rosa damascena flower water	yes	no
silybum marianum seed extract	yes	no
sodium benzoate	yes	no
sodium c14-16 olefin sulfonate	no	yes
sodium citrate	no	yes
theobroma cacao seed extract	yes	no
trisodium ethylenediamine disuccinate	no	yes
ulmus davidiana root extract	no	yes
vaccinium macrocarpon fruit extract	yes	no
vinegar	no	yes
water	no	yes

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Rawquest if you want a comparable formula for $24.28 less.

Choose SKIN1004 if you want Cica in the formula.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spots Clear breakouts Smooth fine lines Hydrate & plump

Calm redness Refine texture Repair & strengthen Protect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.