[Pyunkang Yul] Black Tea Boosting Serum 45ml vs [Dr.Jart+] Ceramidin Skin Barrier Moisture Recovery Serum 30ml

[Pyunkang Yul] Black Tea Boosting Serum 45ml and [Dr.Jart+] Ceramidin Skin Barrier Moisture Recovery Serum 30ml share 10 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Some links are affiliate links — if you buy, we may earn a commission at no cost to you. It never changes a product's score or ranking. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

• 
  [Pyunkang Yul] Black Tea Boosting Serum 45ml
• 
  [Dr.Jart+] Ceramidin Skin Barrier Moisture Recovery Serum 30ml

Clear allAdd product2 of 8

Permalink for this comparison →

FitFormulaValueUse together

Full comparison

Loading product details…

Full ingredient comparisonLabels, evidence & retailer offers

How much do the ingredient lists overlap?

16%

Ingredients in every formula

10in both formulas

Key actives unique to one formula

3unique actives

Ingredient rows compared

61rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.

How do the ingredient lists differ?

61 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(51 of 61 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side

on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Recommended Pyunkang Yul [Pyunkang Yul] Black Tea Boosting Serum 45ml $76.50 Reference price Save	Dr.Jart+ [Dr.Jart+] Ceramidin Skin Barrier Moisture Recovery Serum 30ml $41.70 $41.70 at Ballagrio ↗Save
Basics
Type & size	Serum · size not on the record	Serum · size not on the record
Brand origin	Korean	Korean
Offers
Where to buydiffers	No offers listed	$41.70 · Ballagrio
Availabilitydiffers	No offers listed	In stock
Formula
Key activesdiffers	panthenol, sodium hyaluronate, centella asiatica extract, ceramide np	ceramide np
Free ofdiffers	fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free	Not recorded
Heads-updiffers	fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag	None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 56 ingredients	Partially captured — 15 of 21 label entries matched, some checks not run
Key actives · 3
cica	yes	no
hyaluronic acid (salt form) Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
pro-vitamin b5	yes	no
Rest of the labels · 48
a silicone	yes	no
adenosine	yes	no
asiatic acid	yes	no
asiaticoside	yes	no
beta-glucan	yes	no
camellia sinensis leaf extract	yes	no
caprylyl glycol	yes	no
ceramide eop	yes	no
ceramide ns	yes	no
cetyl ethylhexanoate	yes	no
cholesterol	yes	no
coccinia indica fruit extract	yes	no
coptis japonica extract	yes	no
dicaprylyl ether	yes	no
disodium edta	yes	no
eclipta prostrata extract	yes	no
ethylhexyl palmitate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
gardenia florida fruit extract	yes	no
glyceryl stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
hippophae rhamnoides fruit extract	yes	no
hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
hydroxyacetophenone	yes	no
hydroxypropyltrimonium hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
macadamia ternifolia seed oil	yes	no
madecassic acid	yes	no
madecassoside	yes	no
maltodextrin	yes	no
panax ginseng berry extract	yes	no
pentylene glycol	yes	no
phellodendron amurense bark extract	yes	no
piper methysticum root extract	yes	no
polyglyceryl-10 dilaurate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
polyglyceryl-10 myristate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
polyglyceryl-10 oleate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
polyglyceryl-10 stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
potassium cetyl phosphate	yes	no
saccharomyces ferment filtrate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
scrophularia buergeriana extract	yes	no
scutellaria baicalensis root extract	yes	no
silica	yes	no
sodium acetylated hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
sodium hyaluronate crosspolymer Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
sodium stearoyl glutamate	no	yes
sucrose distearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
tromethamine	yes	no
vitamin e	no	yes
water	yes	no
xanthan gum	yes	no

Dr.Jart+'s label is only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Pyunkang Yul if you want Pro-vitamin B5 in the formula.

Choose Dr.Jart+ if you want a comparable formula for $34.80 less.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

Focus on an effect

All ingredientsBrighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plumpCalm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sunGo

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plump

Calm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sun

Related formula comparisons

More suggestions →

• Pyunkang YulVSTIRTIR Cica Care Serum 50ml
• Dr.Jart+VS[Abib] PDRN Volume Fill-it Booster Creme 2.5 Tube 30ml
• Pyunkang YulVSBANOBAGI Vita Genic Jelly Cica Ampoule 30ml

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.