PUREGRAM Origin Booster Shot 300 Spicules Ampoule Tube Type 30ml vs THE WHOO Bichup Self-Generating Anti-Aging Essence 50ml

PUREGRAM Origin Booster Shot 300 Spicules Ampoule Tube Type 30ml and THE WHOO Bichup Self-Generating Anti-Aging Essence 50ml share 24 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

• 
  PUREGRAM Origin Booster Shot 300 Spicules Ampoule Tube Type 30ml
• 
  THE WHOO Bichup Self-Generating Anti-Aging Essence 50ml

Clear allAdd product2 of 8

Permalink for this comparison →

FitFormulaValueUse together

Full comparison

Loading product details…

Full ingredient comparisonLabels, evidence & retailer offers

How much do the ingredient lists overlap?

23%

Ingredients in every formula

24in both formulas

Key actives unique to one formula

7unique actives

Ingredient rows compared

104rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.

How do the ingredient lists differ?

104 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(80 of 104 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side

on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Puregram PUREGRAM Origin Booster Shot 300 Spicules Ampoule Tube Type 30ml $12.87 Reference price Save	Recommended The Whoo THE WHOO Bichup Self-Generating Anti-Aging Essence 50ml $119.21 Reference price Save
Basics
Type & sizediffers	Serum · size not on the record	Serum · 50 ml
Offers
Where to buy	No offers listed	No offers listed
Availability	No offers listed	No offers listed
Formula
Key activesdiffers	niacinamide, ceramide np, sodium hyaluronate, hyaluronic acid	panthenol, squalane, ceramide np, allantoin, titanium dioxide, arbutin, niacinamide
Free ofdiffers	fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free	Not recorded
Heads-updiffers	fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed	pregnancy caution · fragrance allergensPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 44 ingredients	Partially captured — 84 of 128 label entries matched, some checks not run
Key actives · 7
allantoin	no	yes
arbutin Pregnancy: caution	no	yes
hyaluronic acid Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
hyaluronic acid (salt form) Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
pro-vitamin b5	no	yes
squalane	no	yes
titanium dioxide Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
Rest of the labels · 73
a silicone	no	yes
adenosine	yes	no
amodimethicone	no	yes
arachidyl glucoside	no	yes
asparagine	no	yes
aspartic acid	yes	no
benzyl benzoate	no	yes
beta-glucan	no	yes
betaine	no	yes
biotin	no	yes
butylene glycol	no	yes
calcium pantothenate	no	yes
carbomer	no	yes
ceramide ap	yes	no
ceramide as	yes	no
ceramide eop	yes	no
ceramide ns	yes	no
cholesterol	no	yes
cordyceps militaris extract	no	yes
cyanocobalamin	no	yes
cysteine	yes	no
cystine	no	yes
dimethiconol	no	yes
folic acid	no	yes
fragrance	no	yes
geraniol	no	yes
glutamine	no	yes
glyceryl polymethacrylate	no	yes
glyceryl stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
glycine	no	yes
glycyrrhetinic acid	no	yes
histidine hcl	no	yes
hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
hydrolyzed sodium hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
hydrolyzed sponge	yes	no
hydroxyacetophenone	yes	no
hydroxycitronellal	no	yes
hydroxyethylpiperazine ethane sulfonic acid	no	yes
hydroxyproline	no	yes
hydroxypropyltrimonium hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
inositol	no	yes
isoleucine	yes	no
limonene	no	yes
linalool	no	yes
mica	no	yes
nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
peg-10 rapeseed sterol	no	yes
peg-100 stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
phytosterols	no	yes
polyisobutene	yes	no
polymethylsilsesquioxane	no	yes
poria cocos extract	no	yes
potassium aspartate	no	yes
potassium hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
potassium sorbate	no	yes
propylene glycol	no	yes
pyridoxine hcl	no	yes
quercetin	no	yes
riboflavin	no	yes
shea butter	no	yes
sodium acetylated hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
sodium dna	no	yes
sodium glutamate	no	yes
sodium hyaluronate crosspolymer Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
sodium lactate	no	yes
sodium stearoyl glutamate	no	yes
thiamine hcl	no	yes
trehalose	no	yes
triethylhexanoin	no	yes
tromethamine	no	yes
tryptophan	no	yes
vitamin e	no	yes
xanthan gum	yes	no

The Whoo's label is only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Puregram if you want a comparable formula for $106.34 less.

Choose The Whoo if you want Pro-vitamin B5 in the formula.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

Focus on an effect

All ingredientsBrighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plumpCalm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sunGo

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plump

Calm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sun

Related formula comparisons

More suggestions →

• PuregramVSAnua 8 Hyaluronic Acid Liposome Skin Booster 150ml
• The WhooVS[The History of Whoo] Ultimate Recovery NAD Power Ampoule 20ml/30ml
• PuregramVSCentellian24 Madeca Mela Essence Treatment 500ml

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.