Payot My Payot Radiance Cleansing Mask 100ml vs L'Oréal, Ever Pure, Glossing 5-Min Lamination Mask, 5.1 fl oz (150 ml)

Payot My Payot Radiance Cleansing Mask 100ml and L'Oréal, Ever Pure, Glossing 5-Min Lamination Mask, 5.1 fl oz (150 ml) share 7 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

19%

Ingredients in every formula

7in both formulas

Key actives unique to one formula

3unique actives

Ingredient rows compared

37rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

The formulas, row by row

37 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(30 of 37 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side

on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Recommended Payot Payot My Payot Radiance Cleansing Mask 100ml $36.00 Save	L'Oréal L'Oréal, Ever Pure, Glossing 5-Min Lamination Mask, 5.1 fl oz (150 ml) $14.68 Save
Basics
Type & size	Mask · size not on the record	Mask · size not on the record
Offers
Where to buy	Not recorded	Not recorded
Availability	in stock	in stock
Formula
Key activesdiffers	glycolic acid, lactic acid, mandelic acid	salicylic acid, glycolic acid
Free of	sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free	sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free
Heads-updiffers	photosensitizing · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag	pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fragrance allergens · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 20 ingredients	Fully parsed · 24 ingredients
Key actives · 3
aha exfoliant (gentle)	yes	no
bha exfoliant	no	yes
mandelic acid Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
Rest of the labels · 27
benzoic acid	no	yes
c15-19 alkane	yes	no
carbomer	no	yes
cetyl betaine	yes	no
ci 14700	yes	no
ci 19140	yes	no
ci 77891	no	yes
citronellol	no	yes
cocamide mea	no	yes
cocamidopropyl betaine	no	yes
coco-betaine	no	yes
ethylhexyl palmitate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
euterpe oleracea fruit extract	yes	no
glycol distearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
hexylene glycol	no	yes
hydroxypropyl guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chloride	no	yes
limonene	no	yes
lycium barbarum fruit extract	yes	no
o-cymen-5-ol	yes	no
peg-55 propylene glycol oleate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
potassium sorbate	yes	no
punica granatum fruit extract	yes	no
sodium benzoate	no	yes
sodium c14-16 olefin sulfonate	no	yes
sodium hydroxide	no	yes
sodium lauroyl sarcosinate	no	yes
sorbic acid	yes	no

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Payot if you want AHA exfoliant (gentle) in the formula.

Choose L'Oréal if you want BHA exfoliant in the formula.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

Focus on an effect

All ingredientsBrighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plumpCalm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sunGo

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plump

Calm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

• PayotVSThe Masknificent Three
• L'OréalVSKérastase Symbiose Micro-Peeling Cellulaire 200 ml
• PayotVSLalarecipe, Yuzu Vita-C Cream, 1.69 fl oz (50 ml)

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.