Paul Mitchell, Tea Tree®, Thickening Conditioner®, Lemon Sage, 10.14 fl oz (300 ml) vs Cantu, Shea Butter, Moisturizing Rinse Out Conditioner, 13.5 fl oz (400 ml)

Paul Mitchell, Tea Tree®, Thickening Conditioner®, Lemon Sage, 10.14 fl oz (300 ml) and Cantu, Shea Butter, Moisturizing Rinse Out Conditioner, 13.5 fl oz (400 ml) share 8 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Shared 8Paul Mitchell, Tea Tree®, Thickening Conditioner®, Lemon Sage, 10.14 fl oz (300 ml) only 23Cantu, Shea Butter, Moisturizing Rinse Out Conditioner, 13.5 fl oz (400 ml) only 12

2 of 6

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

19%

Ingredients in every formula: 8in both formulas
Key actives unique to one formula: 0unique actives
Ingredient rows compared: 43rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

The formulas, row by row

43 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(35 of 43 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side
on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Paul Mitchell Paul Mitchell, Tea Tree®, Thickening Conditioner®, Lemon Sage, 10.14 fl oz (300 ml) $25.14	Recommended Cantu Cantu, Shea Butter, Moisturizing Rinse Out Conditioner, 13.5 fl oz (400 ml) $5.77
Basics
Type & size	Conditioner · size not on the record	Conditioner · size not on the record
Offers
Where to buy	Not recorded	Not recorded
Availability	in stock	in stock
Formula
Key actives	panthenol	panthenol
Free ofdiffers	sulfate-free, paraben-free	sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free
Heads-updiffers	fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag	fragrance allergensPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 31 ingredients	Fully parsed · 20 ingredients
Rest of the labels · 35
alcohol	yes	no
behentrimonium methosulfate	yes	no
benzoic acid	no	yes
benzyl salicylate	no	yes
bht	yes	no
butylphenyl methylpropional	no	yes
ci 15985	no	yes
ci 19140	no	yes
citric acid	yes	no
cycloheptasiloxane	no	yes
disodium phosphate	yes	no
ethylhexylglycerin	no	yes
glycereth-2 cocoate	no	yes
glyceryl stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
hydroxyethylcellulose	yes	no
linalool	no	yes
magnesium chloride	yes	no
magnesium nitrate	yes	no
maleic acid	no	yes
methylchloroisothiazolinone	yes	no
methylisothiazolinone	yes	no
olealkonium chloride	yes	no
oleyl alcohol	yes	no
panthenyl ethyl ether	yes	no
peg-2m	yes	no
phenoxyethanol	no	yes
sodium benzoate	yes	no
sodium hydroxide	yes	no
sodium phosphate	yes	no
tetramethyl acetyloctahydronaphthalenes	yes	no
tridecane	yes	no
undecane	yes	no
vitamin e	yes	no
water	yes	no
water	no	yes

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Paul Mitchell if you want this formula as listed.

Choose Cantu if you want a comparable formula for $19.37 less.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spots Clear breakouts Smooth fine lines Hydrate & plump

Calm redness Refine texture Repair & strengthen Protect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.