Pantene Pro-V Miracles Lift'N'Volume Volumizing Conditioner with Biotin 160ml vs Paul Mitchell, Tea Tree®, Thickening Conditioner®, Lemon Sage, 10.14 fl oz (300 ml)
Pantene Pro-V Miracles Lift'N'Volume Volumizing Conditioner with Biotin 160ml and Paul Mitchell, Tea Tree®, Thickening Conditioner®, Lemon Sage, 10.14 fl oz (300 ml) share 8 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 8Pantene Pro-V Miracles Lift'N'Volume Volumizing Conditioner with Biotin 160ml only 11Paul Mitchell, Tea Tree®, Thickening Conditioner®, Lemon Sage, 10.14 fl oz (300 ml) only 23
Permalink for this comparison →
Shared formula
19%
- Ingredients in every formula
- 8in both formulas
- Key actives unique to one formula
- 0unique actives
- Ingredient rows compared
- 42rows compared
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
The formulas, row by row
42 ingredients across 2 labels| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | Recommended  Pantene Pantene Pro-V Miracles Lift'N'Volume Volumizing Conditioner with Biotin 160ml$10.00 | |
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Conditioner · size not on the record | Conditioner · size not on the record |
| Brand origindiffers | American | Not recorded |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Availability | in stock | in stock |
Formula | ||
| Key actives | panthenol | panthenol |
| Free ofdiffers | sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free | sulfate-free, paraben-free |
| Heads-updiffers | fragrance allergensPore data not yet reviewed | fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 19 ingredients | Fully parsed · 31 ingredients |
Rest of the labels · 34 | ||
a silicone | no | yes |
alcohol | no | yes |
behentrimonium methosulfate | no | yes |
benzyl alcohol | yes | no |
bht | no | yes |
biotin | yes | no |
cetearyl alcohol | no | yes |
citronellol | yes | no |
disodium phosphate | no | yes |
fatty alcohol (non-drying) | yes | no |
geraniol | yes | no |
glutamic acid | yes | no |
glyceryl stearate | no | yes |
hexyl cinnamal | no | yes |
histidine | yes | no |
hydroxycitronellal | yes | no |
hydroxyethylcellulose | no | yes |
limonene | no | yes |
linalool | yes | no |
magnesium chloride | no | yes |
magnesium nitrate | no | yes |
menthol | yes | no |
methylchloroisothiazolinone | no | yes |
methylisothiazolinone | no | yes |
olealkonium chloride | no | yes |
oleyl alcohol | no | yes |
peg-2m | no | yes |
sodium hydroxide | no | yes |
sodium phosphate | no | yes |
stearyl alcohol | yes | no |
tetramethyl acetyloctahydronaphthalenes | no | yes |
tridecane | no | yes |
undecane | no | yes |
vitamin e | no | yes |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
The bottom line
Choose Pantene if you want a comparable formula for $15.14 less.
Choose Paul Mitchell if you want this formula as listed.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Focus on an effect
People also compare
- PantenePantene Pro-V Miracles Molecular Bond Repair Conditioner 160 Ml
- Paul MitchellPantene Pro-V Shampoo
- PantenePantene Pro-V Active Classic Clean Hair Conditioner – 230ml
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.