numbuzin No.4 Full-Nutrient Firming Cream 60ml and Elizavecca, Gold CF-Nest-B-Jo Eye Want Cream, 3.53 oz (100 g) share 12 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 12numbuzin No.4 Full-Nutrient Firming Cream 60ml only 35Elizavecca, Gold CF-Nest-B-Jo Eye Want Cream, 3.53 oz (100 g) only 13
Permalink for this comparison →
20%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Moisturizer · size not on the record | Moisturizer · size not on the record |
| Brand origin | Korean | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Availabilitydiffers | Not recorded | in stock |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | niacinamide, sodium hyaluronate, panthenol, centella asiatica extract, ceramide np | niacinamide, sodium hyaluronate |
| Free of | sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free | sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free |
| Heads-up | fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed | fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 47 ingredients | Fully parsed · 25 ingredients |
Key actives · 3 | ||
ceramide np | yes | no |
cica | yes | no |
pro-vitamin b5 | yes | no |
Rest of the labels · 45 | ||
1,2-hexanediol | no | yes |
behenyl alcohol | yes | no |
beta-glucan | yes | no |
butylene glycol | yes | no |
cetearyl glucoside | no | yes |
cetyl ethylhexanoate | no | yes |
cholesterol | yes | no |
cyanocobalamin | yes | no |
cyclohexasiloxane | yes | no |
dimethiconol | yes | no |
dioscorea japonica root extract | yes | no |
ethylhexylglycerin | yes | no |
fatty alcohol (non-drying) | yes | no |
folic acid | yes | no |
ginkgo biloba leaf extract | no | yes |
glyceryl stearate se | yes | no |
glycosyl trehalose | yes | no |
gold | no | yes |
hippophae rhamnoides seed oil | no | yes |
hydrogenated lecithin | yes | no |
hydrogenated polydecene | yes | no |
hydrogenated starch hydrolysate | yes | no |
hydrolyzed corn starch | yes | no |
hydroxyacetophenone | yes | no |
hydroxydecyl ubiquinone | yes | no |
lecithin | yes | no |
macadamia integrifolia seed oil | yes | no |
macadamia ternifolia seed oil | no | yes |
panax ginseng root extract | yes | no |
pentaerythrityl distearate | yes | no |
pentaerythrityl tetraethylhexanoate | yes | no |
phenoxyethanol | no | yes |
polyglyceryl-10 laurate | yes | no |
polyglyceryl-3 methylglucose distearate | yes | no |
raffinose | yes | no |
ruscus aculeatus root extract | no | yes |
shea butter | no | yes |
sodium stearoyl glutamate | yes | no |
sorbitan isostearate | yes | no |
sorbitan sesquioleate | no | yes |
sucrose | yes | no |
swiftlet nest extract | no | yes |
tromethamine | yes | no |
vitamin e | yes | no |
xanthan gum | no | yes |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose numbuzin if you want Pro-vitamin B5 in the formula.
Choose Elizavecca if you want a comparable formula for $46.24 less.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.