numbuzin No.3 Porcelain Base-skip Tone Up Beige SPF50+ PA++++ 50ml (2 Types) and SOL LABS® Natural Mineral SPF 30 On-The-Go Sunscreen Packets (Box of 12) - Broad Spectrum UVA/UVB Protection & Hydrating Formula share 8 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 8numbuzin No.3 Porcelain Base-skip Tone Up Beige SPF50+ PA++++ 50ml (2 Types) only 26SOL LABS® Natural Mineral SPF 30 On-The-Go Sunscreen Packets (Box of 12) - Broad Spectrum UVA/UVB Protection & Hydrating Formula only 12
Permalink for this comparison →
17%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Sunscreen · size not on the record | Sunscreen · size not on the record |
| Brand origindiffers | Korean | Not recorded |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | zinc oxide, titanium dioxide, niacinamide, centella asiatica extract | zinc oxide, titanium dioxide, niacinamide, centella asiatica extract, sodium hyaluronate |
| Free of | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Heads-up | None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed | None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Partially captured — 34 of 59 label entries matched, some checks not run | Partially captured — 20 of 28 label entries matched, some checks not run |
Key actives · 1 | ||
hyaluronic acid (salt form) | no | yes |
Rest of the labels · 37 | ||
a silicone | no | yes |
acrylates copolymer | no | yes |
aluminum hydroxide | yes | no |
artemisia capillaris extract | yes | no |
astaxanthin | no | yes |
butyloctyl salicylate | yes | no |
camellia sinensis leaf extract | yes | no |
caprylyl glycol | yes | no |
caprylyl methicone | yes | no |
coconut oil | no | yes |
cyclohexasiloxane | yes | no |
dicaprylyl carbonate | yes | no |
disiloxane | yes | no |
disteardimonium hectorite | yes | no |
ethylhexylglycerin | yes | no |
glycerin | no | yes |
glyceryl caprylate | yes | no |
lauryl polyglyceryl-3 polydimethylsiloxyethyl dimethicone | yes | no |
magnesium sulfate | yes | no |
methyl methacrylate crosspolymer | yes | no |
mica | yes | no |
pentylene glycol | yes | no |
phenoxyethanol | no | yes |
polyglyceryl-2 dipolyhydroxystearate | yes | no |
polyglyceryl-3 diisostearate | no | yes |
polyglyceryl-3 polydimethylsiloxyethyl dimethicone | yes | no |
polygonum cuspidatum root extract | yes | no |
polymethylsilsesquioxane | yes | no |
propanediol | yes | no |
propylheptyl caprylate | yes | no |
scutellaria baicalensis root extract | yes | no |
shea butter | no | yes |
tocopheryl acetate | no | yes |
trimethylsiloxysilicate | yes | no |
vitamin e | yes | no |
water | no | yes |
xanthan gum | no | yes |
numbuzin and SOL LABS have labels only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose numbuzin if you want a comparable formula for $19.84 less.
Choose SOL LABS if you want this formula as listed.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.