numbuzin No.3 Porcelain Base-skip Tone Up Beige SPF50+ PA++++ 50ml (2 Types) vs celimax Oil Control Light Sunscreen SPF 50+ PA++++ (40ml / 1.35 fl oz)

numbuzin No.3 Porcelain Base-skip Tone Up Beige SPF50+ PA++++ 50ml (2 Types) and celimax Oil Control Light Sunscreen SPF 50+ PA++++ (40ml / 1.35 fl oz) share 19 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Shared 19numbuzin No.3 Porcelain Base-skip Tone Up Beige SPF50+ PA++++ 50ml (2 Types) only 15celimax Oil Control Light Sunscreen SPF 50+ PA++++ (40ml / 1.35 fl oz) only 17

2 of 6

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

37%

Ingredients in every formula: 19in both formulas
Key actives unique to one formula: 2unique actives
Ingredient rows compared: 51rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.

The formulas, row by row

51 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(32 of 51 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side
on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	numbuzin numbuzin No.3 Porcelain Base-skip Tone Up Beige SPF50+ PA++++ 50ml (2 Types) $14.16	Recommended Celimax celimax Oil Control Light Sunscreen SPF 50+ PA++++ (40ml / 1.35 fl oz) $9.68
Basics
Type & size	Sunscreen · size not on the record	Sunscreen · size not on the record
Brand origindiffers	Korean	Not recorded
Offers
Where to buy	Not recorded	Not recorded
Formula
Key activesdiffers	zinc oxide, titanium dioxide, niacinamide, centella asiatica extract	zinc oxide, niacinamide, titanium dioxide, sodium hyaluronate
Free ofdiffers	Not recorded	fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free
Heads-updiffers	None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed	fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Partially captured — 34 of 59 label entries matched, some checks not run	Fully parsed · 36 ingredients
Key actives · 2
cica	yes	no
hyaluronic acid (salt form) Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
Rest of the labels · 30
4-terpineol	no	yes
adenosine	no	yes
aluminum hydroxide	yes	no
artemisia capillaris extract	yes	no
bis-ethylhexyloxyphenol methoxyphenyl triazine	no	yes
butylene glycol	yes	no
calcium aluminum borosilicate	no	yes
camellia sinensis leaf extract	yes	no
cetyl diglyceryl tris(trimethylsiloxy)silylethyl dimethicone	no	yes
dibutyl adipate	no	yes
diethylamino hydroxybenzoyl hexyl benzoate	no	yes
dipropylene glycol	no	yes
disiloxane	yes	no
ethylhexyl triazone	no	yes
houttuynia cordata extract	yes	no
lauryl polyglyceryl-3 polydimethylsiloxyethyl dimethicone	yes	no
mica	yes	no
pentylene glycol	yes	no
phenyl trimethicone	no	yes
pinus palustris leaf extract	no	yes
polyglyceryl-2 dipolyhydroxystearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
polyglyceryl-6 polyricinoleate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
polygonum cuspidatum root extract	yes	no
propanediol	yes	no
pueraria lobata root extract	no	yes
scutellaria baicalensis root extract	yes	no
silica	no	yes
trimethylsiloxysilicate	yes	no
ulmus davidiana root extract	no	yes
water	no	yes

numbuzin's label is only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose numbuzin if you want Cica in the formula.

Choose Celimax if you want a comparable formula for $4.48 less.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spots Clear breakouts Smooth fine lines Hydrate & plump

Calm redness Refine texture Repair & strengthen Protect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.