NIVEA Soft Moisturizing Cream vs Embryolisse, Hydra-Cream Energizing, Normal to Dry Skin, 1.35 fl oz (40 ml)

NIVEA Soft Moisturizing Cream and Embryolisse, Hydra-Cream Energizing, Normal to Dry Skin, 1.35 fl oz (40 ml) share 11 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

21%

Ingredients in every formula

11in both formulas

Key actives unique to one formula

0unique actives

Ingredient rows compared

53rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

The formulas, row by row

53 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(42 of 53 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side

on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	shot Nivea NIVEA Soft Moisturizing Cream Save	Embryolisse Embryolisse, Hydra-Cream Energizing, Normal to Dry Skin, 1.35 fl oz (40 ml) $32.00 Save
Basics
Type & size	Moisturizer · size not on the record	Moisturizer · size not on the record
Brand origindiffers	European	Not recorded
Offers
Where to buy	Not recorded	Not recorded
Availabilitydiffers	Not recorded	in stock
Formula
Key actives	Not recorded	Not recorded
Free of	sulfate-free, paraben-free, silicone-free	sulfate-free, paraben-free, silicone-free
Heads-up	fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag	fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 36 ingredients	Fully parsed · 28 ingredients
Rest of the labels · 42
1,2-hexanediol	no	yes
alcohol	no	yes
alpha-isomethyl ionone	yes	no
arachidic acid Fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
caprylyl glycol	no	yes
cetyl ricinoleate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
citric acid	no	yes
citronellol	yes	no
coco-caprylate	yes	no
dicaprylyl ether	no	yes
disodium cetearyl sulfosuccinate	yes	no
drying alcohol	yes	no
euphorbia cerifera cera	no	yes
gellan gum	yes	no
helianthus annuus seed oil	no	yes
hippophae rhamnoides fruit extract	no	yes
hydrogenated coco-glycerides	yes	no
hydroxycitronellal	no	yes
hydroxypropyl starch phosphate	yes	no
illite	no	yes
lauric acid Fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
lecithin	no	yes
linalool	yes	no
linalyl acetate	yes	no
myristic acid Fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
myristyl alcohol	yes	no
oleic acid Fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
palmitic acid Fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
phenoxyethanol	yes	no
polygonum bistorta root extract	no	yes
sclerotium gum	no	yes
simmondsia chinensis seed oil	yes	no
sodium acrylates copolymer	no	yes
sodium stearoyl glutamate	no	yes
sorbitan olivate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
sorbitan stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
stearic acid Fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
terpineol	yes	no
triisostearin	yes	no
vegetable oil	yes	no
vitamin e	no	yes
xanthan gum	yes	no

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Nivea if you want this formula as listed.

Choose Embryolisse if you want this formula as listed.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

Focus on an effect

All ingredientsBrighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plumpCalm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sunGo

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plump

Calm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

• NiveaVSNivea Soft
• EmbryolisseVSAnti-âge Soin de jour Q10 Active
• NiveaVSCrème Visage Solaire Anti-Rides UV Q10 FPS 50

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.