Crème Protection Solaire Spray FPS 50+ Sensitive vs Euphidra Tinted Even-Tone Anti-Aging Sunscreen SPF 50+ Medium Dark Shade 30 ml

Crème Protection Solaire Spray FPS 50+ Sensitive and Euphidra Tinted Even-Tone Anti-Aging Sunscreen SPF 50+ Medium Dark Shade 30 ml share 12 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Shared 12Crème Protection Solaire Spray FPS 50+ Sensitive only 16Euphidra Tinted Even-Tone Anti-Aging Sunscreen SPF 50+ Medium Dark Shade 30 ml only 21

2 of 6

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

24%

Ingredients in every formula: 12in both formulas
Key actives unique to one formula: 3unique actives
Ingredient rows compared: 49rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

The formulas, row by row

49 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(37 of 49 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side
on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Nivea Crème Protection Solaire Spray FPS 50+ Sensitive	Recommended Euphidra Euphidra Tinted Even-Tone Anti-Aging Sunscreen SPF 50+ Medium Dark Shade 30 ml $40.00
Basics
Type & size	Sunscreen · size not on the record	Sunscreen · size not on the record
Brand origindiffers	European	Not recorded
Offers
Where to buy	Not recorded	Not recorded
Availabilitydiffers	Not recorded	in stock
Formula
Key activesdiffers	Not recorded	titanium dioxide, niacinamide, sodium hyaluronate
Free of	fragrance-free, sulfate-free, paraben-free, silicone-free	fragrance-free, sulfate-free, paraben-free, silicone-free
Heads-updiffers	fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag	fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 28 ingredients	Fully parsed · 33 ingredients
Key actives · 3
hyaluronic acid (salt form) Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
titanium dioxide Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
vitamin b3	no	yes
Rest of the labels · 34
aloe barbadensis leaf juice powder	yes	no
alpha-glucan oligosaccharide	no	yes
c12-15 alkyl benzoate	yes	no
c18-38 alkyl hydroxystearoyl stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
c20-22 alcohols	no	yes
c20-22 alkyl phosphate	no	yes
cetyl palmitate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
citric acid	no	yes
coco-caprylate	no	yes
copernicia cerifera cera	yes	no
dibutyl adipate	yes	no
dicaprylyl carbonate	no	yes
dicaprylyl ether	no	yes
dipotassium glycyrrhizate	no	yes
ethylhexylglycerin	yes	no
glyceryl stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
glycyrrhiza inflata root extract	yes	no
hamamelis virginiana leaf water	no	yes
hydrogenated rapeseed oil	yes	no
hydroxyacetophenone	no	yes
inulin	no	yes
isopropyl palmitate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
oryza sativa starch	no	yes
pentaerythrityl distearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
phenylbenzimidazole sulfonic acid	yes	no
phytic acid	no	yes
polyhydroxystearic acid Fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
potassium cetyl phosphate	no	yes
ricinus communis seed oil	no	yes
sodium chloride	yes	no
sodium stearoyl glutamate	yes	no
tetrasodium glutamate diacetate	no	yes
trisodium edta	yes	no
xanthan gum	yes	no

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Nivea if you want this formula as listed.

Choose Euphidra if you want Titanium Dioxide in the formula.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spots Clear breakouts Smooth fine lines Hydrate & plump

Calm redness Refine texture Repair & strengthen Protect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.