[MISSHA] Red Bean Retinol Pore Peel to Foam 120ml and MEDI-PEEL Lacto Pore Lifting Pad 2X 140ml 50ea share 12 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 12[MISSHA] Red Bean Retinol Pore Peel to Foam 120ml only 33MEDI-PEEL Lacto Pore Lifting Pad 2X 140ml 50ea only 12
Permalink for this comparison →
21%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Exfoliant · size not on the record | Exfoliant · size not on the record |
| Brand origin | Korean | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buydiffers | $23.50 · Ballagrio | $17.94 · Dodoskin |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | centella asiatica extract, ceramide np, retinol, sodium hyaluronate | sodium hyaluronate, ceramide np, hyaluronic acid |
| Free ofdiffers | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, paraben-free, silicone-free | Not recorded |
| Heads-updiffers | pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed | None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 45 ingredients | Partially captured — 24 of 33 label entries matched, some checks not run |
Key actives · 3 | ||
cica | yes | no |
hyaluronic acid | no | yes |
vitamin a | yes | no |
Rest of the labels · 42 | ||
acrylates copolymer | yes | no |
alcohol | yes | no |
beta-glucan | yes | no |
bifida ferment lysate | no | yes |
capryloyl salicylic acid | yes | no |
caprylyl glycol | yes | no |
cellulose | yes | no |
cholesterol | yes | no |
coco-betaine | yes | no |
cyanocobalamin | yes | no |
dextrin | yes | no |
diglycerin | no | yes |
dipropylene glycol | yes | no |
disodium cocoamphodiacetate | yes | no |
ethylhexylglycerin | no | yes |
hexylene glycol | yes | no |
hydrogenated phosphatidylcholine | yes | no |
hydrolyzed elastin | yes | no |
hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid | no | yes |
hydrolyzed sodium hyaluronate | no | yes |
hydroxystearic acid | no | yes |
lactobacillus ferment lysate | no | yes |
lactococcus ferment lysate | no | yes |
methylpropanediol | yes | no |
morus alba root extract | yes | no |
palmitic acid | yes | no |
peg-60 hydrogenated castor oil | no | yes |
phaseolus angularis seed extract | yes | no |
phaseolus angularis seed powder | yes | no |
phenylpropanol | yes | no |
polyglyceryl-10 laurate | no | yes |
polyvinyl alcohol | yes | no |
potassium benzoate | yes | no |
sodium chloride | yes | no |
sodium cocoyl alaninate | yes | no |
sodium hyaluronate crosspolymer | no | yes |
sodium lauroyl methyl isethionate | yes | no |
sodium phytate | yes | no |
stearic acid | yes | no |
sucrose distearate | yes | no |
vitamin e | yes | no |
water | yes | no |
Medi-peel's label is only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose Missha if you want Cica in the formula.
Choose Medi-peel if you want a comparable formula for $2.96 less.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.