[MISSHA] M Perfect Cover Serum BB Cream PRO SPF 50+ PA ++++ 50ml and VT Cosmetics PDRN Essence Glow Sun Pact SPF 50+ PA+++ (10g / 0.35 oz) share 12 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 12[MISSHA] M Perfect Cover Serum BB Cream PRO SPF 50+ PA ++++ 50ml only 28VT Cosmetics PDRN Essence Glow Sun Pact SPF 50+ PA+++ (10g / 0.35 oz) only 17
Permalink for this comparison →
21%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Serum · size not on the record | Serum · size not on the record |
| Brand origin | Korean | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | zinc oxide, titanium dioxide, niacinamide | zinc oxide, titanium dioxide |
| Free of | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Heads-up | pregnancy cautionPore data not yet reviewed | pregnancy cautionPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Partially captured — 40 of 55 label entries matched, some checks not run | Partially captured — 29 of 40 label entries matched, some checks not run |
Key actives · 1 | ||
vitamin b3 | yes | no |
Rest of the labels · 44 | ||
a silicone | no | yes |
alumina | yes | no |
anthemis nobilis flower oil | yes | no |
bacillus ferment | yes | no |
bifida ferment filtrate | yes | no |
bifida ferment lysate | yes | no |
bis-ethylhexyloxyphenol methoxyphenyl triazine | no | yes |
ceresin | no | yes |
ci 77491 | yes | no |
ci 77492 | yes | no |
ci 77499 | yes | no |
cyclopentasiloxane | yes | no |
disodium edta | no | yes |
disodium stearoyl glutamate | yes | no |
disteardimonium hectorite | yes | no |
ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate | no | yes |
ethylhexyl palmitate | no | yes |
glyceryl caprylate | yes | no |
hectorite | yes | no |
homosalate | yes | no |
hydrogen dimethicone | no | yes |
hydrolyzed elastin | no | yes |
hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid | no | yes |
lactobacillus | yes | no |
lactobacillus ferment | yes | no |
lactobacillus ferment lysate | yes | no |
lactococcus ferment | yes | no |
lactococcus ferment lysate | yes | no |
lecithin | no | yes |
magnesium sulfate | yes | no |
mica | no | yes |
octocrylene | no | yes |
octyldodecanol | no | yes |
peg-10 dimethicone | yes | no |
pelargonium graveolens flower oil | yes | no |
pentylene glycol | yes | no |
phenoxyethanol | no | yes |
saccharomyces ferment | yes | no |
sea water | no | yes |
synthetic fluorphlogopite | yes | no |
ultramarines | no | yes |
vitamin e | yes | no |
water | yes | no |
water | no | yes |
Missha and VT Cosmetics have labels only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose Missha if you want Vitamin B3 in the formula.
Choose VT Cosmetics if you want a comparable formula for $7.33 less.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.