[MEDI-PEEL] Peptide 9 Volume Lif-Tox Eye Cream 20ml and numbuzin No.4 Ceramide AHA Glazed Skin Prep Serum (30ml / 1.01 fl oz) share 16 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 16[MEDI-PEEL] Peptide 9 Volume Lif-Tox Eye Cream 20ml only 26numbuzin No.4 Ceramide AHA Glazed Skin Prep Serum (30ml / 1.01 fl oz) only 24
Permalink for this comparison →
24%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Exfoliant · size not on the record | Exfoliant · size not on the record |
| Brand origin | Korean | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | niacinamide, panthenol, centella asiatica extract, hyaluronic acid, squalane, ceramide np, sodium hyaluronate | glycolic acid, niacinamide, panthenol, sodium hyaluronate, hyaluronic acid, urea, ceramide np |
| Free ofdiffers | Not recorded | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free |
| Heads-updiffers | None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed | photosensitizing · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Partially captured — 42 of 64 label entries matched, some checks not run | Fully parsed · 40 ingredients |
Key actives · 4 | ||
aha exfoliant | no | yes |
cica | yes | no |
squalane | yes | no |
urea | no | yes |
Rest of the labels · 46 | ||
benzyl glycol | no | yes |
beta-glucan | no | yes |
caprylyl glycol | yes | no |
carbomer | yes | no |
carnosine | yes | no |
ceramide ap | no | yes |
ceramide as | no | yes |
ceramide eop | no | yes |
ceramide ns | no | yes |
cetyl ethylhexanoate | yes | no |
cholesterol | no | yes |
cyclohexasiloxane | yes | no |
diphenyl dimethicone | no | yes |
dipotassium glycyrrhizate | yes | no |
disodium edta | yes | no |
ethylhexyl stearate | yes | no |
fragrance | yes | no |
gluconolactone | no | yes |
glyceryl stearate | yes | no |
hydrogenated lecithin | no | yes |
hydrogenated polyisobutene | yes | no |
hydrolyzed collagen | yes | no |
hydrolyzed glycosaminoglycans | no | yes |
hydrolyzed sodium hyaluronate | yes | no |
hydroxyacetophenone | yes | no |
hydroxyethyl urea | no | yes |
hydroxyethylcellulose | no | yes |
hydroxypropyltrimonium hyaluronate | yes | no |
lactobacillus | yes | no |
olive oil | yes | no |
pentylene glycol | no | yes |
phytosphingosine | no | yes |
polyglyceryl-10 laurate | no | yes |
potassium hyaluronate | yes | no |
propanediol | no | yes |
royal jelly extract | yes | no |
shea butter | yes | no |
sodium acetylated hyaluronate | yes | no |
sodium hydroxide | no | yes |
sodium polyacrylate | yes | no |
sphingomonas ferment extract | no | yes |
tocopheryl acetate | yes | no |
triethylhexanoin | no | yes |
tromethamine | yes | no |
vitamin e | no | yes |
water | no | yes |
Medi-peel's label is only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose Medi-peel if you want Cica in the formula.
Choose numbuzin if you want AHA exfoliant in the formula.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.