MEDI-PEEL Peptide 9 Volume Bio Tox Grinding Cleansing Balm Pro 50ml vs Scinic Perfect Peeling Gommage Gel
MEDI-PEEL Peptide 9 Volume Bio Tox Grinding Cleansing Balm Pro 50ml and Scinic Perfect Peeling Gommage Gel share 8 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 8MEDI-PEEL Peptide 9 Volume Bio Tox Grinding Cleansing Balm Pro 50ml only 13Scinic Perfect Peeling Gommage Gel only 27
Permalink for this comparison →
Shared formula
17%
- Ingredients in every formula
- 8in both formulas
- Key actives unique to one formula
- 4unique actives
- Ingredient rows compared
- 48rows compared
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
The formulas, row by row
48 ingredients across 2 labels| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & sizediffers | Exfoliant · size not on the record | Exfoliant · 120ml |
| Brand origindiffers | Korean | Not recorded |
Offers | ||
| Where to buydiffers | $31.85 · Dodoskin | Not recorded |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | allantoin | centella asiatica extract, allantoin, urea, panthenol, ceramide np |
| Free ofdiffers | sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free | sulfate-free, paraben-free, silicone-free |
| Heads-updiffers | fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed | fragrance allergensPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 21 ingredients | Fully parsed · 35 ingredients |
Key actives · 4 | ||
ceramide np | no | yes |
cica | no | yes |
pro-vitamin b5 | no | yes |
urea | no | yes |
Rest of the labels · 36 | ||
alcohol | no | yes |
amaranthus caudatus seed extract | no | yes |
atelocollagen | yes | no |
betaine | no | yes |
borago officinalis seed oil | no | yes |
bromelain | no | yes |
butylphenyl methylpropional | no | yes |
carbomer | no | yes |
cedrus atlantica bark oil | yes | no |
cellulose | no | yes |
ceresin | yes | no |
cetearyl alcohol | yes | no |
cetyl ethylhexanoate | yes | no |
cholesterol | no | yes |
citrus junos fruit extract | yes | no |
citrus unshiu peel extract | no | yes |
folic acid | no | yes |
glycerin | yes | no |
hydrogenated polyisobutene | yes | no |
lactobacillus | yes | no |
macadamia integrifolia seed oil | no | yes |
mannitol | no | yes |
morus bombycis root extract | no | yes |
papain | no | yes |
peg-20 glyceryl triisostearate | yes | no |
phenoxyethanol | no | yes |
polyethylene | yes | no |
polyglyceryl-2 oleate | yes | no |
portulaca oleracea extract | no | yes |
raffinose | no | yes |
saxifraga sarmentosa extract | no | yes |
scutellaria baicalensis root extract | no | yes |
tocopheryl acetate | yes | no |
triethanolamine | no | yes |
tromethamine | no | yes |
ulmus davidiana root extract | no | yes |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
The bottom line
Choose Medi-peel if you want this formula as listed.
Choose Scinic if you want Cica in the formula.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Focus on an effect
People also compare
- Medi-peelMEDI-PEEL Peptide 9 Volume Lifting All In One Essence Pro (100ml / 3.38 fl oz)
- Scinicnumbuzin No.4 Full-Nutrient Firming Cream 60ml
- Medi-peelCentellian24 Madeca Cream Time Reverse Zero (80ml / 2.71 fl oz)
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.