MEDI-PEEL Hyaluronic Acid Layer Water Tox Ampoule 30ml and Mary & May, Vegan CICA Tea Tree AHA PHA Blemish Toner, 6.76 fl oz (200 ml) share 12 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 12MEDI-PEEL Hyaluronic Acid Layer Water Tox Ampoule 30ml only 33Mary & May, Vegan CICA Tea Tree AHA PHA Blemish Toner, 6.76 fl oz (200 ml) only 10
Permalink for this comparison →
22%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Exfoliant · size not on the record | Exfoliant · size not on the record |
| Brand origin | Korean | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buydiffers | $17.27 · Dodoskin | Not recorded |
| Availabilitydiffers | Not recorded | in stock |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | niacinamide, sodium hyaluronate, allantoin, panthenol, squalane, ceramide np | niacinamide, allantoin |
| Free of | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free |
| Heads-updiffers | fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed | None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 45 ingredients | Fully parsed · 22 ingredients |
Key actives · 4 | ||
ceramide np | yes | no |
hyaluronic acid (salt form) | yes | no |
pro-vitamin b5 | yes | no |
squalane | yes | no |
Rest of the labels · 39 | ||
anemarrhena asphodeloides root extract | yes | no |
arginine | yes | no |
artemisia annua extract | no | yes |
beta-glucan | yes | no |
caprylyl glycol | no | yes |
carbomer | yes | no |
centella asiatica leaf extract | no | yes |
centella asiatica root extract | yes | no |
citric acid | no | yes |
citrus junos fruit extract | no | yes |
collagen | yes | no |
disodium edta | yes | no |
eclipta prostrata leaf extract | yes | no |
ectoin | yes | no |
enantia chlorantha bark extract | yes | no |
ethylhexylglycerin | yes | no |
fructooligosaccharides | yes | no |
gluconolactone | no | yes |
glucose | no | yes |
glutamic acid | yes | no |
glyceryl glucoside | yes | no |
glyceryl linoleate | yes | no |
glycine | yes | no |
hydrogenated lecithin | yes | no |
hydrogenated polyisobutene | yes | no |
hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid | yes | no |
hydroxypropyl cyclodextrin | yes | no |
laminaria japonica extract | yes | no |
mentha arvensis leaf oil | no | yes |
methylpropanediol | yes | no |
oleanolic acid | yes | no |
phytosphingosine | yes | no |
pinus densiflora leaf extract | no | yes |
polyglutamic acid | yes | no |
sucrose distearate | yes | no |
sucrose palmitate | yes | no |
tromethamine | yes | no |
vitamin e | yes | no |
xanthan gum | no | yes |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose Medi-peel if you want Pro-vitamin B5 in the formula.
Choose Mary & May if you want a comparable formula for $3.92 less.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.