Essential storage keeps the site working. Optional cookies and tracking support analytics, sampled session replay, error reports and affiliate tools.
Either choice lets you browse. Change it anytime in the footer. Cookie details.
MEDI-PEEL Cica Antio Cream 30ml and Scinic Perfect Peeling Gommage Gel share 13 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 13MEDI-PEEL Cica Antio Cream 30ml only 44Scinic Perfect Peeling Gommage Gel only 22
Permalink for this comparison →
Loading product details…
16%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & sizediffers | Exfoliant · size not on the record | Exfoliant · 120ml |
| Brand origindiffers | Korean | Not recorded |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | No offers listed | No offers listed |
| Availability | No offers listed | No offers listed |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | niacinamide, centella asiatica extract, allantoin, panthenol, squalane, sodium hyaluronate, ceramide np, hyaluronic acid | centella asiatica extract, allantoin, urea, panthenol, ceramide np |
| Free ofdiffers | sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free | sulfate-free, paraben-free, silicone-free |
| Heads-updiffers | fragrance allergens · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed | fragrance allergensPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 57 ingredients | Fully parsed · 35 ingredients |
Key actives · 5 | ||
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
Rest of the labels · 61 | ||
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose Medi-peel if you want Vitamin B3 in the formula.
Choose Scinic if you want Urea in the formula.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.