[Losy Kim] VOL Mellow Blushing Serum 4.2g vs House of Hur, Glowy Ampoule Tint, 02 Brown Red, 0.15 oz (4.5 g)

[Losy Kim] VOL Mellow Blushing Serum 4.2g and House of Hur, Glowy Ampoule Tint, 02 Brown Red, 0.15 oz (4.5 g) share 10 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Shared 10[Losy Kim] VOL Mellow Blushing Serum 4.2g only 19House of Hur, Glowy Ampoule Tint, 02 Brown Red, 0.15 oz (4.5 g) only 31

2 of 6

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

17%

Ingredients in every formula: 10in both formulas
Key actives unique to one formula: 5unique actives
Ingredient rows compared: 60rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

The formulas, row by row

60 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(50 of 60 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side
on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Losy Kim [Losy Kim] VOL Mellow Blushing Serum 4.2g $24.30 $27.90 at Ballagrio ↗	Recommended House of Hur House of Hur, Glowy Ampoule Tint, 02 Brown Red, 0.15 oz (4.5 g) $12.32
Basics
Type & size	Serum · size not on the record	Serum · size not on the record
Offers
Where to buydiffers	$27.90 · Ballagrio	Not recorded
Availabilitydiffers	Not recorded	in stock
Formula
Key activesdiffers	titanium dioxide, sodium hyaluronate, hyaluronic acid, niacinamide	squalane, titanium dioxide, niacinamide, ascorbic acid, retinol
Free of	fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free	fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free
Heads-updiffers	fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed	pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 29 ingredients	Fully parsed · 41 ingredients
Key actives · 5
hyaluronic acid Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
hyaluronic acid (salt form) Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
squalane	no	yes
vitamin a	no	yes
vitamin c	no	yes
Rest of the labels · 45
a silicone	no	yes
adenosine	yes	no
aluminum hydroxide	no	yes
ammonium polyacrylate	no	yes
anemarrhena asphodeloides root extract	yes	no
bioflavonoids	no	yes
biotin	no	yes
ci 15850	yes	no
ci 15985	no	yes
ci 17200	no	yes
ci 42090	no	yes
ci 77491	yes	no
ci 77499	yes	no
cyanocobalamin	no	yes
diglycerin	no	yes
diisostearyl malate	yes	no
diphenyl dimethicone	no	yes
folic acid	no	yes
glutathione	no	yes
honey extract	no	yes
hydrogenated polycyclopentadiene	no	yes
hydrolyzed collagen	yes	no
hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
isododecane	yes	no
lauryl peg-9 polydimethylsiloxyethyl dimethicone	no	yes
linoleic acid Fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
linolenic acid	yes	no
menadione	no	yes
mica	yes	no
pantothenic acid	no	yes
pentylene glycol	no	yes
phenoxyethanol	no	yes
phenyl trimethicone	no	yes
polyglyceryl-2 diisostearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
polyglyceryl-2 triisostearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
propanediol	no	yes
propylene carbonate	yes	no
pyridoxine	no	yes
riboflavin	no	yes
silica	yes	no
sorbitan isostearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
thiamine hcl	no	yes
triethoxycaprylylsilane	yes	no
trisodium ethylenediamine disuccinate	no	yes
water	no	yes

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Losy Kim if you want this formula as listed.

Choose House of Hur if you want Squalane in the formula.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spots Clear breakouts Smooth fine lines Hydrate & plump

Calm redness Refine texture Repair & strengthen Protect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.