Essential storage keeps sign-in, your bag and requested features working. With your permission, optional analytics, sampled session replay, error reports and affiliate tools help us understand and improve the site.
You can use the site without optional tracking and change your choice from the footer. Read the cookie details.
LANEIGE Perfect Renew 3X Serum Advanced 40ml and Sulwhasoo First Care Activating Serum VI 30ml share 17 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 17LANEIGE Perfect Renew 3X Serum Advanced 40ml only 29Sulwhasoo First Care Activating Serum VI 30ml only 26
Permalink for this comparison →
Loading product details…
24%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Serum · size not on the record | Serum · size not on the record |
| Brand origin | Korean | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | No offers listed | No offers listed |
| Availability | No offers listed | No offers listed |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | niacinamide, retinol, ceramide np | Not recorded |
| Free ofdiffers | Not recorded | sulfate-free, paraben-free, silicone-free |
| Heads-updiffers | pregnancy caution · photosensitizingPore data not yet reviewed | fragrance allergensPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Partially captured — 46 of 77 label entries matched, some checks not run | Fully parsed · 43 ingredients |
Key actives · 3 | ||
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
Rest of the labels · 52 | ||
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
Laneige's label is only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose Laneige if you want Vitamin B3 in the formula.
Choose Sulwhasoo if you want this formula as listed.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.