Nutritic Lèvres - soin transformation lèvres desséchées vs Aquaphor

Nutritic Lèvres - soin transformation lèvres desséchées and Aquaphor share 7 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Shared 7Nutritic Lèvres - soin transformation lèvres desséchées only 19Aquaphor only 8

2 of 6

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

21%

Ingredients in every formula: 7in both formulas
Key actives unique to one formula: 2unique actives
Ingredient rows compared: 34rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.

The formulas, row by row

34 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(27 of 34 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side
on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	La Roche-Posay Nutritic Lèvres - soin transformation lèvres desséchées	Recommended Eucerin Aquaphor
Basics
Type & size	Lip care · size not on the record	Lip care · size not on the record
Brand origin	European	European
Offers
Where to buy	Not recorded	Not recorded
Formula
Key activesdiffers	Not recorded	panthenol, sodium ascorbyl phosphate
Free ofdiffers	fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free	Not recorded
Heads-updiffers	fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag	None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 26 ingredients	Partially captured — 15 of 21 label entries matched, some checks not run
Key actives · 2
pro-vitamin b5	no	yes
sodium ascorbyl phosphate Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
Rest of the labels · 25
aluminum hydroxide	yes	no
ascorbyl palmitate Pregnancy: generally fine Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
bisabolol	no	yes
c18-38 alkyl hydroxystearoyl stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
c20-40 alkyl stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
cetyl palmitate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
ci 77891	yes	no
citric acid	yes	no
coriandrum sativum seed oil	yes	no
echium plantagineum seed oil	yes	no
fatty alcohol (non-drying)	yes	no
glycine soja oil	yes	no
hydrogenated castor oil	no	yes
hydrogenated polyisobutene	yes	no
hydroxypalmitoyl sphinganine	yes	no
limnanthes alba seed oil	yes	no
magnesium stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
myristyl myristate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
pentaerythrityl tetra-di-t-butyl hydroxyhydrocinnamate	yes	no
polybutene	yes	no
polyethylene	yes	no
polyglyceryl-3 diisostearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
prunus armeniaca kernel oil	yes	no
ribes nigrum seed oil	yes	no
silica	yes	no

Eucerin's label is only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose La Roche-Posay if you want this formula as listed.

Choose Eucerin if you want Pro-vitamin B5 in the formula.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spots Clear breakouts Smooth fine lines Hydrate & plump

Calm redness Refine texture Repair & strengthen Protect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.