Effaclar and [Centellian24] Madeca Matcha Pore Cleansing Oil 200ml share 5 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 5Effaclar only 9[Centellian24] Madeca Matcha Pore Cleansing Oil 200ml only 33
Permalink for this comparison →
11%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Cleanser · size not on the record | Cleanser · size not on the record |
| Brand origindiffers | European | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buydiffers | Not recorded | $25.25 · Dodoskin |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | glycolic acid, niacinamide, salicylic acid | lactic acid, glycolic acid, niacinamide, argania spinosa kernel oil, centella asiatica extract |
| Free ofdiffers | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free | sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free |
| Heads-updiffers | pregnancy caution · photosensitizingPore data not yet reviewed | pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 14 ingredients | Fully parsed · 38 ingredients |
Key actives · 4 | ||
aha exfoliant (gentle) | no | yes |
argan oil | no | yes |
bha exfoliant | yes | no |
cica | no | yes |
Rest of the labels · 38 | ||
1,2-hexanediol | no | yes |
asiatic acid | no | yes |
asiaticoside | no | yes |
butylene glycol | no | yes |
camellia sinensis leaf extract | no | yes |
camellia sinensis leaf water | no | yes |
camellia sinensis seed oil | no | yes |
centella asiatica leaf extract | no | yes |
cetyl ethylhexanoate | no | yes |
dimethyl isosorbide | yes | no |
diospyros kaki leaf extract | no | yes |
dipropylene glycol | no | yes |
disodium edta | no | yes |
epigallocatechin gallate | no | yes |
ethoxydiglycol | no | yes |
ethylhexylglycerin | no | yes |
fragrance | no | yes |
fructooligosaccharides | no | yes |
glucose | no | yes |
glycerin | no | yes |
hydroxyacetophenone | no | yes |
hydroxyethylpiperazine ethane sulfonic acid | yes | no |
madecassic acid | no | yes |
madecassoside | no | yes |
ocimum sanctum leaf extract | no | yes |
peg-30 glyceryl cocoate | yes | no |
peg-60 hydrogenated castor oil | yes | no |
pentylene glycol | yes | no |
phytic acid | yes | no |
polyglyceryl-10 diisostearate | no | yes |
polyglyceryl-10 laurate | no | yes |
polyglyceryl-6 dicaprate | no | yes |
polygonum cuspidatum root extract | no | yes |
propanediol | yes | no |
sodium citrate | no | yes |
sodium hydroxide | yes | no |
vitamin e | no | yes |
zanthoxylum piperitum fruit extract | no | yes |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose La Roche-Posay if you want BHA exfoliant in the formula.
Choose Centellian24 if you want AHA exfoliant (gentle) in the formula.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.