Cicaplast Mains vs Palmer's, Skin Success® with Vitamin E, Fade Milk Tone Correcting Body Lotion, 8.5 fl oz (250 ml)
Cicaplast Mains and Palmer's, Skin Success® with Vitamin E, Fade Milk Tone Correcting Body Lotion, 8.5 fl oz (250 ml) share 7 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 7Cicaplast Mains only 5Palmer's, Skin Success® with Vitamin E, Fade Milk Tone Correcting Body Lotion, 8.5 fl oz (250 ml) only 23
Permalink for this comparison →
Shared formula
20%
- Ingredients in every formula
- 7in both formulas
- Key actives unique to one formula
- 1unique active
- Ingredient rows compared
- 35rows compared
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
The formulas, row by row
35 ingredients across 2 labels| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | Recommended  Palmer's Palmer's, Skin Success® with Vitamin E, Fade Milk Tone Correcting Body Lotion, 8.5 fl oz (250 ml)$10.99 | |
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Body lotion · size not on the record | Body lotion · size not on the record |
| Brand origindiffers | European | American |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Availabilitydiffers | Not recorded | in stock |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | niacinamide | niacinamide, retinol |
| Free ofdiffers | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free | sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free |
| Heads-updiffers | fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed | pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 12 ingredients | Fully parsed · 30 ingredients |
Key actives · 1 | ||
vitamin a | no | yes |
Rest of the labels · 27 | ||
alpha-isomethyl ionone | no | yes |
ascorbyl palmitate | no | yes |
butylphenyl methylpropional | no | yes |
caprylyl glycol | yes | no |
citric acid | no | yes |
citronellol | no | yes |
disodium edta | no | yes |
ethylhexyl dimethyl paba | no | yes |
ethylhexylglycerin | no | yes |
fragrance | no | yes |
glyceryl stearate se | yes | no |
hydroxycitronellal | no | yes |
hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde | no | yes |
isopropyl myristate | no | yes |
lauryl glucoside | no | yes |
limonene | no | yes |
linalool | no | yes |
paraffinum liquidum | no | yes |
peg-100 stearate | no | yes |
propylene glycol | no | yes |
shea butter | yes | no |
sodium polyacrylate | yes | no |
stearyl alcohol | no | yes |
tricholoma matsutake extract | no | yes |
water | yes | no |
water | no | yes |
xanthan gum | no | yes |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
The bottom line
Choose La Roche-Posay if you avoid fragrance.
Choose Palmer's if you want Vitamin A in the formula.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Focus on an effect
People also compare
- La Roche-PosayLa Roche-Posay - Cicaplast Mains
- Palmer'sVaseline Body Lotion 400ml Double Set (Sensitive Relief / Lavender Calming)
- La Roche-PosayCrème mains réparatrice
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.