La Roche Posay Anthelios 100 KA+ med Protective cream for the prevention of actinic keratosis and non-melanoma skin cancers - 50 ml and Cetaphil, Derma Control™, Oil Absorbing Moisturizer, For Oily Skin, SPF 30, 4 fl oz (118 ml) share 11 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 11La Roche Posay Anthelios 100 KA+ med Protective cream for the prevention of actinic keratosis and non-melanoma skin cancers - 50 ml only 20Cetaphil, Derma Control™, Oil Absorbing Moisturizer, For Oily Skin, SPF 30, 4 fl oz (118 ml) only 16
Permalink for this comparison →
23%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | Recommended ![]() Cetaphil Cetaphil, Derma Control™, Oil Absorbing Moisturizer, For Oily Skin, SPF 30, 4 fl oz (118 ml)$23.91 | |
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Moisturizer · size not on the record | Moisturizer · size not on the record |
| Brand origindiffers | European | American |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Availability | in stock | in stock |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | titanium dioxide | allantoin, ceramide np, panthenol |
| Free ofdiffers | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, paraben-free | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free |
| Heads-updiffers | pregnancy caution · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag | pregnancy caution · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 31 ingredients | Fully parsed · 27 ingredients |
Key actives · 4 | ||
allantoin | no | yes |
ceramide np | no | yes |
pro-vitamin b5 | no | yes |
titanium dioxide | yes | no |
Rest of the labels · 32 | ||
aluminum hydroxide | yes | no |
aluminum starch octenylsuccinate | no | yes |
ammonium polyacryloyldimethyl taurate | yes | no |
bis-ethylhexyloxyphenol methoxyphenyl triazine | yes | no |
c12-15 alkyl benzoate | yes | no |
carbomer | no | yes |
diisopropyl sebacate | no | yes |
dimethiconol | no | yes |
drometrizole trisiloxane | yes | no |
drying alcohol | yes | no |
ethylhexyl triazone | yes | no |
glyceryl stearate | yes | no |
glycine soja oil | yes | no |
glycyrrhetinic acid | no | yes |
hydroxypropyl methylcellulose | yes | no |
methyl methacrylate crosspolymer | yes | no |
palmitic acid | yes | no |
peg-100 stearate | yes | no |
polymethyl methacrylate | no | yes |
potassium cetyl phosphate | yes | no |
silica | no | yes |
sodium stearoyl glutamate | no | yes |
stearic acid | yes | no |
stearyl alcohol | yes | no |
sucrose tristearate | no | yes |
terephthalylidene dicamphor sulfonic acid | yes | no |
tocopheryl acetate | no | yes |
vitamin e | yes | no |
water | yes | no |
water | no | yes |
xanthan gum | no | yes |
zinc gluconate | no | yes |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose La Roche-Posay if you want Titanium Dioxide in the formula.
Choose Cetaphil if you want Allantoin in the formula.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.