JUNGSAEMMOOL BeginS by JUNGSAEMMOOL Blue Chamomile Hyaluronic Acid Purple Tone Up Sunscreen 50ml vs Blue Lizard Australian Sunscreen, Sheer Face Mineral Sunscreen, SPF 50, 1.7 fl oz (50 ml)

JUNGSAEMMOOL BeginS by JUNGSAEMMOOL Blue Chamomile Hyaluronic Acid Purple Tone Up Sunscreen 50ml and Blue Lizard Australian Sunscreen, Sheer Face Mineral Sunscreen, SPF 50, 1.7 fl oz (50 ml) share 12 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

15%

Ingredients in every formula

12in both formulas

Key actives unique to one formula

4unique actives

Ingredient rows compared

82rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.

The formulas, row by row

82 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(70 of 82 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side

on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Jung Saem Mool JUNGSAEMMOOL BeginS by JUNGSAEMMOOL Blue Chamomile Hyaluronic Acid Purple Tone Up Sunscreen 50ml $26.40 $26.40 at Dodoskin ↗Save	Recommended Blue Lizard Australian Sunscreen Blue Lizard Australian Sunscreen, Sheer Face Mineral Sunscreen, SPF 50, 1.7 fl oz (50 ml) $15.99 Save
Basics
Type & size	Sunscreen · size not on the record	Sunscreen · size not on the record
Offers
Where to buydiffers	$26.40 · Dodoskin	Not recorded
Availabilitydiffers	Not recorded	in stock
Formula
Key activesdiffers	niacinamide, titanium dioxide, sodium hyaluronate, ceramide np	titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, sodium hyaluronate, squalane
Free of	Not recorded	Not recorded
Heads-up	None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed	None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Partially captured — 54 of 73 label entries matched, some checks not run	Partially captured — 40 of 54 label entries matched, some checks not run
Key actives · 4
ceramide np	yes	no
squalane	no	yes
vitamin b3	yes	no
zinc oxide Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
Rest of the labels · 66
1,2-hexanediol	yes	no
a silicone	yes	no
adenosine	yes	no
aloe vera	no	yes
alumina	no	yes
aluminum hydroxide	yes	no
aluminum stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
ammonium polyacryloyldimethyl taurate	yes	no
aspartic acid	no	yes
behenyl alcohol	yes	no
butylene glycol	yes	no
c12-15 alkyl benzoate	no	yes
c12-20 alkyl glucoside	yes	no
c14-22 alcohols	yes	no
carbomer	yes	no
cetearyl alcohol	yes	no
citric acid	no	yes
coco-caprylate	yes	no
crithmum maritimum extract	no	yes
dibutyl adipate	yes	no
diethylamino hydroxybenzoyl hexyl benzoate	yes	no
diisopropyl sebacate	no	yes
disodium edta	yes	no
drometrizole trisiloxane	yes	no
ethylhexyl triazone	yes	no
glutamic acid	yes	no
glyceryl stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
glyceryl stearate citrate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
guaiazulene	yes	no
histidine	no	yes
hydrogenated vegetable oil	no	yes
hydrolyzed sodium hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
hydroxyacetophenone	yes	no
hydroxycinnamic acid	yes	no
isoleucine	no	yes
isononyl isononanoate	yes	no
isostearyl alcohol	no	yes
isostearyl isostearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
lysine	yes	no
methylpropanediol	yes	no
nicotinamide mononucleotide Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
palmitic acid Fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
pca	no	yes
phenoxyethanol	no	yes
phenylalanine	no	yes
phosphatidylcholine	yes	no
polyglyceryl-3 diisostearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
polyglyceryl-3 distearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
polyglyceryl-3 methylglucose distearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
polyglyceryl-3 polyricinoleate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
polymethylsilsesquioxane	yes	no
potassium cetyl phosphate	yes	no
potassium sorbate	no	yes
propanediol	yes	no
rutin	yes	no
sodium benzoate	no	yes
sodium chloride	no	yes
sodium lactate	no	yes
sodium pca	no	yes
sorbitan isostearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
stearic acid Fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
terephthalylidene dicamphor sulfonic acid	yes	no
tocopheryl acetate	no	yes
tromethamine	yes	no
ultramarines	yes	no
valine	no	yes

Jung Saem Mool and Blue Lizard Australian Sunscreen have labels only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Jung Saem Mool if you want Vitamin B3 in the formula.

Choose Blue Lizard Australian Sunscreen if you want Zinc Oxide in the formula.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

Focus on an effect

Focus on an effect

All ingredientsBrighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plumpCalm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sunGo

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plump

Calm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

• Jung Saem MoolVSmedicube Collagen Firming Sun Cream 50ml
• Blue Lizard Australian SunscreenVSAmino Rain™ Glasswater Serum
• Jung Saem MoolVSmedicube Collagen Firming Sun Cream SPF 50+ PA++++ (50ml / 1.69 fl oz)

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.