Huxley Conditioning Shampoo Rose Picker 750ml and NATURE REPUBLIC Black Bean Anti Hair Loss Shampoo 300ml (22AD) share 12 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 12Huxley Conditioning Shampoo Rose Picker 750ml only 14NATURE REPUBLIC Black Bean Anti Hair Loss Shampoo 300ml (22AD) only 33
Permalink for this comparison →
20%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Shampoo · size not on the record | Shampoo · size not on the record |
| Brand origindiffers | Not recorded | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buydiffers | $30.88 · Dodoskin | Not recorded |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | panthenol, salicylic acid, niacinamide, ceramide np | panthenol, niacinamide, ceramide np |
| Free of | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Heads-updiffers | pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fragrance allergensPore data not yet reviewed | None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Partially captured — 26 of 40 label entries matched, some checks not run | Partially captured — 45 of 65 label entries matched, some checks not run |
Key actives · 1 | ||
bha exfoliant | yes | no |
Rest of the labels · 46 | ||
acacia senegal gum | no | yes |
acorus calamus root extract | no | yes |
alpha-isomethyl ionone | yes | no |
bacillus ferment | yes | no |
biota orientalis leaf extract | no | yes |
caprylyl glycol | no | yes |
centella asiatica leaf extract | no | yes |
chrysanthemum zawadskii extract | no | yes |
citrus aurantifolia oil | no | yes |
citrus nobilis peel extract | no | yes |
cocamide methyl mea | yes | no |
disodium edta | yes | no |
disodium laureth sulfosuccinate | no | yes |
fragrance | yes | no |
glycine soja seed extract | no | yes |
glycyrrhiza glabra root extract | no | yes |
hydroxypropyl methylcellulose | no | yes |
lauryl glucoside | yes | no |
limonene | yes | no |
lycium chinense fruit extract | no | yes |
mentha arvensis extract | no | yes |
mentha arvensis leaf oil | no | yes |
morus alba bark extract | no | yes |
nigella sativa seed extract | no | yes |
oryza sativa extract | no | yes |
panax ginseng root extract | no | yes |
peat water | no | yes |
pentasodium pentetate | no | yes |
phytosphingosine | yes | no |
potassium cocoyl glycinate | yes | no |
potassium sorbate | no | yes |
ppg-3 myristyl ether | no | yes |
propolis extract | no | yes |
rehmannia chinensis root extract | no | yes |
ribes nigrum fruit extract | no | yes |
rubus fruticosus fruit extract | no | yes |
salvia hispanica seed extract | no | yes |
sesamum indicum seed extract | no | yes |
sodium benzoate | yes | no |
sodium citrate | yes | no |
sodium cocoyl alaninate | yes | no |
sodium lauroyl methyl isethionate | no | yes |
trihydroxystearin | yes | no |
vaccinium angustifolium fruit extract | no | yes |
water | no | yes |
xanthium strumarium fruit extract | no | yes |
Huxley and Nature Republic have labels only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose Huxley if you want BHA exfoliant in the formula.
Choose Nature Republic if you avoid fragrance.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.