Helia-D Botanic Concept Moisturizing cream for very dry skin 50 ml vs Paul Mitchell, Tea Tree®, Thickening Conditioner®, Lemon Sage, 10.14 fl oz (300 ml)

Helia-D Botanic Concept Moisturizing cream for very dry skin 50 ml and Paul Mitchell, Tea Tree®, Thickening Conditioner®, Lemon Sage, 10.14 fl oz (300 ml) share 9 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Shared 9Helia-D Botanic Concept Moisturizing cream for very dry skin 50 ml only 17Paul Mitchell, Tea Tree®, Thickening Conditioner®, Lemon Sage, 10.14 fl oz (300 ml) only 22

2 of 6

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

19%

Ingredients in every formula: 9in both formulas
Key actives unique to one formula: 3unique actives
Ingredient rows compared: 48rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

The formulas, row by row

48 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(39 of 48 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side
on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Recommended Helia-d Helia-D Botanic Concept Moisturizing cream for very dry skin 50 ml $11.00	Paul Mitchell Paul Mitchell, Tea Tree®, Thickening Conditioner®, Lemon Sage, 10.14 fl oz (300 ml) $25.14
Basics
Type & size	Conditioner · size not on the record	Conditioner · size not on the record
Offers
Where to buy	Not recorded	Not recorded
Availability	in stock	in stock
Formula
Key activesdiffers	sodium hyaluronate, centella asiatica extract, panthenol, allantoin	panthenol
Free ofdiffers	sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free	sulfate-free, paraben-free
Heads-updiffers	fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed	fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 26 ingredients	Fully parsed · 31 ingredients
Key actives · 3
allantoin	yes	no
cica	yes	no
hyaluronic acid (salt form) Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
Rest of the labels · 36
alcohol	no	yes
behentrimonium methosulfate	no	yes
bht	no	yes
cetearyl nonanoate	yes	no
citric acid	no	yes
coco-caprylate	yes	no
disodium phosphate	no	yes
ethylhexylglycerin	yes	no
glycerin	yes	no
glyceryl stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
glyceryl stearate se Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
hexyl cinnamal	no	yes
hydrogenated polydecene	yes	no
hydroxyethylcellulose	no	yes
limonene	no	yes
magnesium chloride	no	yes
magnesium nitrate	no	yes
methylchloroisothiazolinone	no	yes
methylisothiazolinone	no	yes
olealkonium chloride	no	yes
oleyl alcohol	no	yes
panax ginseng root extract	yes	no
panthenyl ethyl ether	no	yes
peg-2m	no	yes
phenoxyethanol	yes	no
phospholipids	yes	no
polyglyceryl-10 stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
potassium sorbate	yes	no
sodium acrylates copolymer	yes	no
sodium phosphate	no	yes
stearamidopropyl dimethylamine	no	yes
tetramethyl acetyloctahydronaphthalenes	no	yes
tocopheryl acetate	yes	no
tridecane	no	yes
undecane	no	yes
wine	yes	no

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Helia-d if you want Cica in the formula.

Choose Paul Mitchell if you want this formula as listed.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spots Clear breakouts Smooth fine lines Hydrate & plump

Calm redness Refine texture Repair & strengthen Protect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.