Anti-roos shampoo + conditioner and Rigenera e protegge share 15 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 15Anti-roos shampoo + conditioner only 13Rigenera e protegge only 6
Permalink for this comparison →
44%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Shampoo · size not on the record | Shampoo · size not on the record |
| Brand origindiffers | American | Not recorded |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | piroctone olamine, panthenol | panthenol |
| Free ofdiffers | alcohol-free, paraben-free | alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free |
| Heads-updiffers | fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag | fragrance allergens · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 28 ingredients | Fully parsed · 21 ingredients |
Key actives · 1 | ||
piroctone olamine | yes | no |
Rest of the labels · 18 | ||
a silicone | yes | no |
benzyl salicylate | yes | no |
ci 42090 | yes | no |
citrus limon fruit extract | yes | no |
cocamide mea | no | yes |
fatty alcohol (non-drying) | no | yes |
glycerin | no | yes |
histidine | no | yes |
limonene | yes | no |
menthol | yes | no |
propylene glycol | yes | no |
sls (a sulfate) | yes | no |
stearyl alcohol | no | yes |
tea-dodecylbenzenesulfonate | yes | no |
tetrasodium edta | yes | no |
tocopheryl acetate | yes | no |
triethylene glycol | yes | no |
trihydroxystearin | no | yes |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose Head & Shoulders if you want Piroctone Olamine in the formula.
Choose Panthene if you want this formula as listed.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.