Essential storage keeps the site working. Optional cookies and tracking support analytics, sampled session replay, error reports and affiliate tools.
Either choice lets you browse. Change it anytime in the footer. Cookie details.
Grafen Sun Pocket™ Oil-Cut Blotting Sun Stick and LANEIGE Radian-C Suncream 50ml share 14 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 14Grafen Sun Pocket™ Oil-Cut Blotting Sun Stick only 23LANEIGE Radian-C Suncream 50ml only 29
Permalink for this comparison →
Loading product details…
21%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Sunscreen · size not on the record | Sunscreen · size not on the record |
| Brand origindiffers | Not recorded | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | No offers listed | No offers listed |
| Availability | No offers listed | No offers listed |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | titanium dioxide | titanium dioxide, panthenol, ceramide np |
| Free ofdiffers | Not recorded | sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free |
| Heads-updiffers | pregnancy caution · fragrance allergensPore data not yet reviewed | pregnancy caution · fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Partially captured — 37 of 60 label entries matched, some checks not run | Fully parsed · 43 ingredients |
Key actives · 2 | ||
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
Rest of the labels · 50 | ||
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
Grafen's label is only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose Grafen if you want a comparable formula for $14.13 less.
Choose Laneige if you want Pro-vitamin B5 in the formula.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.