Grafen Pore All-Kill™ Tightening Serum 30ml and INBUTIM Scalp & Hair Revitalizing Ampoule 100ml share 6 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 6Grafen Pore All-Kill™ Tightening Serum 30ml only 34INBUTIM Scalp & Hair Revitalizing Ampoule 100ml only 3
Permalink for this comparison →
14%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Serum · size not on the record | Serum · size not on the record |
Offers | ||
| Where to buydiffers | $24.55 · Dodoskin | Not recorded |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | niacinamide, sodium hyaluronate, centella asiatica extract, panthenol, ceramide np, caffeine | caffeine, niacinamide, salicylic acid |
| Free ofdiffers | sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free | Not recorded |
| Heads-updiffers | fragrance allergensPore data not yet reviewed | pregnancy caution · photosensitizingPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 40 ingredients | Partially captured — 9 of 28 label entries matched, some checks not run |
Key actives · 5 | ||
bha exfoliant | no | yes |
ceramide np | yes | no |
cica | yes | no |
hyaluronic acid (salt form) | yes | no |
pro-vitamin b5 | yes | no |
Rest of the labels · 32 | ||
abies sibirica oil | yes | no |
adenosine | yes | no |
alcohol denat. | no | yes |
camellia sinensis leaf extract | no | yes |
capryloyl glycine | yes | no |
carbomer | yes | no |
cinnamomum zeylanicum bark extract | yes | no |
dioscorea japonica root extract | yes | no |
dipropylene glycol | yes | no |
ethylhexylglycerin | yes | no |
glycerin | yes | no |
glycosyl trehalose | yes | no |
hexylene glycol | yes | no |
hydrogenated lecithin | yes | no |
hydrogenated starch hydrolysate | yes | no |
hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid | yes | no |
juniperus mexicana oil | yes | no |
lavandula hybrida oil | yes | no |
lecithin | yes | no |
limonene | yes | no |
linalool | yes | no |
maltodextrin | yes | no |
mentha aquatica extract | yes | no |
mentha viridis leaf oil | yes | no |
methylpropanediol | yes | no |
pelargonium graveolens flower oil | yes | no |
pinus palustris leaf extract | yes | no |
pueraria lobata root extract | yes | no |
raffinose | yes | no |
sarcosine | yes | no |
sodium acetylated hyaluronate | yes | no |
ulmus davidiana root extract | yes | no |
Inbutim's label is only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose Grafen if you want Cica in the formula.
Choose Inbutim if you want BHA exfoliant in the formula.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.