Essential storage keeps sign-in, your bag and requested features working. With your permission, optional analytics, sampled session replay, error reports and affiliate tools help us understand and improve the site.
You can use the site without optional tracking and change your choice from the footer. Read the cookie details.
Fraijour Original Wormwood PHA Peeling Essence 120ml and [MEDI-PEEL] Mela+Tox Ampoule 35ml share 8 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 8Fraijour Original Wormwood PHA Peeling Essence 120ml only 10[MEDI-PEEL] Mela+Tox Ampoule 35ml only 38
Permalink for this comparison →
Loading product details…
14%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Exfoliant · size not on the record | Exfoliant · size not on the record |
| Brand origindiffers | Not recorded | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | No offers listed | No offers listed |
| Availability | No offers listed | No offers listed |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | Not recorded | niacinamide, allantoin, panthenol, argania spinosa kernel oil, ascorbic acid, sodium ascorbyl phosphate, ceramide np |
| Free ofdiffers | Not recorded | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free |
| Heads-updiffers | None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed | fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Partially captured — 18 of 39 label entries matched, some checks not run | Fully parsed · 46 ingredients |
Key actives · 7 | ||
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
Rest of the labels · 41 | ||
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| yes | no | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
| no | yes | |
Fraijour's label is only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.