[fino] Premium Touch Conditioner 550ml vs Wella Professionals SP Hydrate conditioner for dry hair 1000 ml

[fino] Premium Touch Conditioner 550ml and Wella Professionals SP Hydrate conditioner for dry hair 1000 ml share 9 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Shared 9[fino] Premium Touch Conditioner 550ml only 25Wella Professionals SP Hydrate conditioner for dry hair 1000 ml only 22

2 of 6

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

16%

Ingredients in every formula: 9in both formulas
Key actives unique to one formula: 4unique actives
Ingredient rows compared: 56rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

The formulas, row by row

56 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(47 of 56 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side
on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Recommended Fino [fino] Premium Touch Conditioner 550ml $17.22 $17.22 at Dodoskin ↗	Wella Wella Professionals SP Hydrate conditioner for dry hair 1000 ml $37.00
Basics
Type & size	Conditioner · size not on the record	Conditioner · size not on the record
Offers
Where to buydiffers	$17.22 · Dodoskin	Not recorded
Availabilitydiffers	Not recorded	in stock
Formula
Key activesdiffers	salicylic acid, squalane, lactic acid	urea
Free ofdiffers	sulfate-free, paraben-free	sulfate-free, alcohol-free, silicone-free
Heads-updiffers	pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag	fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 34 ingredients	Fully parsed · 31 ingredients
Key actives · 4
aha exfoliant (gentle)	yes	no
bha exfoliant	yes	no
squalane	yes	no
urea	no	yes
Rest of the labels · 43
a silicone	yes	no
alpha-isomethyl ionone	yes	no
amodimethicone	yes	no
aspartic acid	no	yes
behentrimonium chloride	yes	no
behenyl alcohol	yes	no
benzyl alcohol	no	yes
benzyl salicylate	no	yes
butylene glycol	yes	no
c10-13 isoparaffin	yes	no
cetearyl alcohol	no	yes
cetrimonium chloride	yes	no
ci 47005	no	yes
citric acid	no	yes
dextrin	no	yes
dipropylene glycol	yes	no
disodium edta	yes	no
fructose	no	yes
glucose	no	yes
glutamic acid	no	yes
glyceryl stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
hexyl nicotinate	no	yes
hexylene glycol	no	yes
hydroxypropyl guar	no	yes
isopentyldiol	yes	no
isopropyl alcohol	yes	no
isopropyl myristate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
limonene	no	yes
methylparaben	no	yes
oleyl alcohol	no	yes
pca	yes	no
peg-2 laurate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
petrolatum	yes	no
propylparaben	no	yes
royal jelly extract	yes	no
sodium benzoate	yes	no
sodium methyltaurate	yes	no
sorbitol	yes	no
stearamidopropyl dimethylamine	no	yes
sucrose	no	yes
vitamin e	yes	no
water	yes	no
water	no	yes

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Fino if you want BHA exfoliant in the formula.

Choose Wella if you want Urea in the formula.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spots Clear breakouts Smooth fine lines Hydrate & plump

Calm redness Refine texture Repair & strengthen Protect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.