[fino] Premium Touch Conditioner 550ml vs LÉa nature so bio étic Protective Conditioner with Organic Castor Oil, 200 ml

[fino] Premium Touch Conditioner 550ml and LÉa nature so bio étic Protective Conditioner with Organic Castor Oil, 200 ml share 5 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Shared 5[fino] Premium Touch Conditioner 550ml only 29LÉa nature so bio étic Protective Conditioner with Organic Castor Oil, 200 ml only 11

2 of 6

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

11%

Ingredients in every formula: 5in both formulas
Key actives unique to one formula: 2unique actives
Ingredient rows compared: 45rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

The formulas, row by row

45 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(40 of 45 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side
on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Recommended Fino [fino] Premium Touch Conditioner 550ml $17.22 $17.22 at Dodoskin ↗	SO BiO étic LÉa nature so bio étic Protective Conditioner with Organic Castor Oil, 200 ml $16.00
Basics
Type & size	Conditioner · size not on the record	Conditioner · size not on the record
Offers
Where to buydiffers	$17.22 · Dodoskin	Not recorded
Availabilitydiffers	Not recorded	in stock
Formula
Key activesdiffers	salicylic acid, squalane, lactic acid	lactic acid
Free ofdiffers	sulfate-free, paraben-free	sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free
Heads-updiffers	pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag	photosensitizing · fragrance allergens · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 34 ingredients	Fully parsed · 16 ingredients
Key actives · 2
bha exfoliant	yes	no
squalane	yes	no
Rest of the labels · 38
a silicone	yes	no
alpha-isomethyl ionone	yes	no
aminopropyl dimethicone	yes	no
amodimethicone	yes	no
arachidyl alcohol	no	yes
arachidyl glucoside	no	yes
arginine ferulate	no	yes
behentrimonium chloride	yes	no
behenyl alcohol	yes	no
benzyl benzoate	yes	no
brassicyl valinate esylate	no	yes
butylene glycol	yes	no
c10-13 isoparaffin	yes	no
caesalpinia spinosa gum	no	yes
cetrimonium chloride	yes	no
dipropylene glycol	yes	no
disodium edta	yes	no
fatty alcohol (non-drying)	yes	no
geraniol	no	yes
glyceryl stearate se Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
hexyl cinnamal	yes	no
isopentyldiol	yes	no
isopropyl alcohol	yes	no
isopropyl myristate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
malva sylvestris extract	no	yes
pca	yes	no
peg-2 laurate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
petrolatum	yes	no
phenoxyethanol	yes	no
ricinus communis seed oil	no	yes
royal jelly extract	yes	no
sodium levulinate	no	yes
sodium methyltaurate	yes	no
sorbitol	yes	no
stearyl alcohol	yes	no
vitamin e	yes	no
water	yes	no
water	no	yes

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Fino if you want BHA exfoliant in the formula.

Choose SO BiO étic if you want a comparable formula for $1.22 less.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spots Clear breakouts Smooth fine lines Hydrate & plump

Calm redness Refine texture Repair & strengthen Protect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.