Shampooing Force (format économique) vs Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Nourishing Shampoo for Dry and Damaged Hair - Volume: 1000 ml
Shampooing Force (format économique) and Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Nourishing Shampoo for Dry and Damaged Hair - Volume: 1000 ml share 10 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 10Shampooing Force (format économique) only 6Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Nourishing Shampoo for Dry and Damaged Hair - Volume: 1000 ml only 23
Permalink for this comparison →
Shared formula
26%
- Ingredients in every formula
- 10in both formulas
- Key actives unique to one formula
- 2unique actives
- Ingredient rows compared
- 39rows compared
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
The formulas, row by row
39 ingredients across 2 labels| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Shampoo · size not on the record | Shampoo · size not on the record |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Availabilitydiffers | Not recorded | in stock |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | panthenol | panthenol, salicylic acid, lactic acid |
| Free ofdiffers | alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free | alcohol-free |
| Heads-updiffers | fragrance allergensPore data not yet reviewed | pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 16 ingredients | Fully parsed · 33 ingredients |
Key actives · 2 | ||
aha exfoliant (gentle) | no | yes |
bha exfoliant | no | yes |
Rest of the labels · 27 | ||
a silicone | no | yes |
benzyl salicylate | no | yes |
ci 42090 | yes | no |
citral | yes | no |
citronellol | yes | no |
cocamide mea | no | yes |
dmdm hydantoin | yes | no |
geraniol | yes | no |
glycerin | no | yes |
glycol distearate | no | yes |
hexyl cinnamal | no | yes |
lycium barbarum fruit extract | no | yes |
magnesium chloride | no | yes |
magnesium nitrate | no | yes |
methylchloroisothiazolinone | no | yes |
methylisothiazolinone | no | yes |
methylparaben | no | yes |
oleic acid | no | yes |
potassium sorbate | no | yes |
sls (a sulfate) | no | yes |
sodium benzoate | no | yes |
sodium citrate | no | yes |
sodium xylenesulfonate | no | yes |
tetrasodium edta | no | yes |
trisodium ethylenediamine disuccinate | no | yes |
water | yes | no |
water | no | yes |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
The bottom line
Choose Eugène Perma if you want this formula as listed.
Choose Wella if you want BHA exfoliant in the formula.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Focus on an effect
People also compare
- Eugène PermaShampooing force vitalité Huiles essentielles de citrus
- WellaVisible repair shampoo Londa 1000ml
- Eugène PermaShampooing Stop Pellicules Classique Gras
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.