Eucerin Actinic Control Md Spf 100 Protective Emulsion 80 ml vs La Roche Posay Anthelios 100 KA+ med Protective cream for the prevention of actinic keratosis and non-melanoma skin cancers - 50 ml

Eucerin Actinic Control Md Spf 100 Protective Emulsion 80 ml and La Roche Posay Anthelios 100 KA+ med Protective cream for the prevention of actinic keratosis and non-melanoma skin cancers - 50 ml share 13 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Shared 13Eucerin Actinic Control Md Spf 100 Protective Emulsion 80 ml only 15La Roche Posay Anthelios 100 KA+ med Protective cream for the prevention of actinic keratosis and non-melanoma skin cancers - 50 ml only 18

2 of 6

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

28%

Ingredients in every formula: 13in both formulas
Key actives unique to one formula: 1unique active
Ingredient rows compared: 46rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

The formulas, row by row

46 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(33 of 46 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side
on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Eucerin Eucerin Actinic Control Md Spf 100 Protective Emulsion 80 ml $69.00	Recommended La Roche-Posay La Roche Posay Anthelios 100 KA+ med Protective cream for the prevention of actinic keratosis and non-melanoma skin cancers - 50 ml $58.00
Basics
Type & size	Moisturizer · size not on the record	Moisturizer · size not on the record
Brand origin	European	European
Offers
Where to buy	Not recorded	Not recorded
Availability	in stock	in stock
Formula
Key activesdiffers	Not recorded	titanium dioxide
Free of	fragrance-free, sulfate-free, paraben-free	fragrance-free, sulfate-free, paraben-free
Heads-updiffers	pregnancy caution · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed	pregnancy caution · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 28 ingredients	Fully parsed · 31 ingredients
Key actives · 1
titanium dioxide Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
Rest of the labels · 32
1,2-hexanediol	yes	no
aluminum hydroxide	no	yes
ammonium polyacryloyldimethyl taurate	no	yes
caprylyl glycol	no	yes
chondrus crispus extract	yes	no
dibutyl adipate	yes	no
diethylamino hydroxybenzoyl hexyl benzoate	yes	no
disodium edta	no	yes
distarch phosphate	yes	no
drometrizole trisiloxane	no	yes
edta	yes	no
glycine soja oil	no	yes
homosalate Pregnancy: caution	yes	no
hydrogenated rapeseed oil	yes	no
hydroxypropyl methylcellulose	no	yes
isopropyl lauroyl sarcosinate	no	yes
methyl methacrylate crosspolymer	no	yes
octocrylene Pregnancy: caution	no	yes
palmitic acid Fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
peg-100 stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
phenylbenzimidazole sulfonic acid	yes	no
potassium cetyl phosphate	no	yes
silica	yes	no
silica dimethyl silylate	yes	no
sodium chloride	yes	no
sodium hydroxide	yes	no
sodium stearoyl glutamate	yes	no
stearic acid Fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
terephthalylidene dicamphor sulfonic acid	no	yes
triethanolamine	no	yes
vitamin e	no	yes
xanthan gum	yes	no

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Eucerin if you want this formula as listed.

Choose La Roche-Posay if you want Titanium Dioxide in the formula.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spots Clear breakouts Smooth fine lines Hydrate & plump

Calm redness Refine texture Repair & strengthen Protect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.