Elizavecca, Gold CF-Nest-B-Jo Eye Want Cream, 3.53 oz (100 g) and Missha, Chogongjin, Sulbon Jin Dark Spot Correcting Cream, 2.02 fl oz (60 ml) share 14 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 14Elizavecca, Gold CF-Nest-B-Jo Eye Want Cream, 3.53 oz (100 g) only 11Missha, Chogongjin, Sulbon Jin Dark Spot Correcting Cream, 2.02 fl oz (60 ml) only 33
Permalink for this comparison →
24%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | Recommended ![]() Missha Missha, Chogongjin, Sulbon Jin Dark Spot Correcting Cream, 2.02 fl oz (60 ml)$36.30 | |
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Moisturizer · size not on the record | Moisturizer · size not on the record |
| Brand origin | Korean | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Availability | in stock | in stock |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | niacinamide, sodium hyaluronate | niacinamide, squalane, ceramide np, hyaluronic acid, sodium hyaluronate, tranexamic acid |
| Free of | sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free | sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free |
| Heads-updiffers | fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed | fragrance allergens · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 25 ingredients | Fully parsed · 47 ingredients |
Key actives · 4 | ||
ceramide np | no | yes |
hyaluronic acid | no | yes |
squalane | no | yes |
tranexamic acid | no | yes |
Rest of the labels · 40 | ||
a silicone | no | yes |
alpha-isomethyl ionone | no | yes |
angelica gigas root extract | no | yes |
arachidyl alcohol | no | yes |
arachidyl glucoside | no | yes |
behenyl alcohol | no | yes |
benzyl benzoate | no | yes |
benzyl salicylate | no | yes |
butylene glycol | no | yes |
citric acid | no | yes |
citronellol | no | yes |
cornus officinalis fruit extract | no | yes |
ethylhexylglycerin | no | yes |
eugenol | no | yes |
geraniol | no | yes |
ginkgo biloba leaf extract | yes | no |
glucose | no | yes |
gold | yes | no |
hippophae rhamnoides seed oil | yes | no |
hydrogenated lecithin | no | yes |
hydrogenated polydecene | no | yes |
hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid | no | yes |
hydroxycitronellal | no | yes |
isoeugenol | no | yes |
linalool | no | yes |
macadamia ternifolia seed oil | yes | no |
methylpropanediol | yes | no |
panax ginseng root extract | no | yes |
pearl extract | no | yes |
peg-100 stearate | no | yes |
phenoxyethanol | yes | no |
polyisobutene | no | yes |
propanediol | no | yes |
ruscus aculeatus root extract | yes | no |
shea butter | yes | no |
sodium citrate | no | yes |
sorbitan isostearate | no | yes |
sorbitan sesquioleate | yes | no |
swiftlet nest extract | yes | no |
xanthan gum | yes | no |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose Elizavecca if you want a comparable formula for $26.06 less.
Choose Missha if you want Squalane in the formula.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.