Dr.Groot Addict Shampoo Classic White 385ml vs Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Nourishing Shampoo for Dry and Damaged Hair - Volume: 1000 ml

Dr.Groot Addict Shampoo Classic White 385ml and Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Nourishing Shampoo for Dry and Damaged Hair - Volume: 1000 ml share 18 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

Permalink for this comparison →

Shared formula

19%

Ingredients in every formula

18in both formulas

Key actives unique to one formula

5unique actives

Ingredient rows compared

94rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.

The formulas, row by row

94 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(76 of 94 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side

on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Recommended Dr.Groot Dr.Groot Addict Shampoo Classic White 385ml $41.00 Save	Wella Wella professionals Invigo Nutri-Enrich Nourishing Shampoo for Dry and Damaged Hair - Volume: 1000 ml $42.00 Save
Basics
Type & size	Shampoo · size not on the record	Shampoo · size not on the record
Offers
Where to buy	Not recorded	Not recorded
Availabilitydiffers	Not recorded	in stock
Formula
Key activesdiffers	hydrolyzed keratin, ceramide np, panthenol, salicylic acid, caffeine, hyaluronic acid, lactic acid, titanium dioxide	panthenol, salicylic acid, lactic acid
Free ofdiffers	sulfate-free, paraben-free, silicone-free	alcohol-free
Heads-updiffers	pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fragrance allergens · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed	pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fragrance allergens · fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 79 ingredients	Fully parsed · 33 ingredients
Key actives · 5
caffeine	yes	no
ceramide np	yes	no
hyaluronic acid Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
hydrolyzed keratin	yes	no
titanium dioxide Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
Rest of the labels · 71
1,2-hexanediol	yes	no
a silicone	no	yes
acrylamidopropyltrimonium chloride	yes	no
alcohol	yes	no
aloe barbadensis leaf extract	yes	no
alpha-isomethyl ionone	yes	no
aminomethyl propanol	yes	no
arginine	yes	no
benzyl benzoate	yes	no
beta-glucan	yes	no
bifida ferment lysate	yes	no
biotin	yes	no
butylene glycol	yes	no
caprylyl glycol	yes	no
cellulose acetate butyrate	yes	no
centella asiatica leaf extract	yes	no
chamaecyparis obtusa leaf extract	yes	no
ci 77491	yes	no
citronellol	yes	no
cocamide mea	no	yes
coco-glucoside	yes	no
coumarin	yes	no
diamond powder	yes	no
disodium cocoamphodiacetate	yes	no
ethylhexylglycerin	yes	no
geraniol	yes	no
glyceryl oleate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
glycol distearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
gold	yes	no
honey extract	yes	no
houttuynia cordata extract	yes	no
hydrolyzed collagen	yes	no
hydrolyzed silk	yes	no
hydroxycitronellal	yes	no
inulin	yes	no
lactobacillus ferment lysate	yes	no
lactococcus ferment lysate	yes	no
lycium barbarum fruit extract	no	yes
magnesium chloride	no	yes
magnesium nitrate	no	yes
mentha arvensis leaf extract	yes	no
menthol	yes	no
methylchloroisothiazolinone	no	yes
methylisothiazolinone	no	yes
methylparaben	no	yes
moringa oleifera seed oil	yes	no
oleic acid Fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
paeonia suffruticosa root extract	yes	no
peg-150 pentaerythrityl tetrastearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
peg-crosspolymer	yes	no
pentylene glycol	yes	no
phellinus linteus extract	yes	no
phenoxyethanol	yes	no
polygonum multiflorum root extract	yes	no
ppg-2 hydroxyethyl cocamide	yes	no
ppg-3 caprylyl ether	yes	no
royal jelly extract	yes	no
saccharomyces cerevisiae extract Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
sles (a sulfate)	no	yes
sls (a sulfate)	no	yes
sodium c14-16 olefin sulfonate	yes	no
sodium hydroxide	no	yes
sodium xylenesulfonate	no	yes
sorbic acid	yes	no
synthetic fluorphlogopite	yes	no
tea-cocoyl glutamate	yes	no
tin oxide	yes	no
trisodium ethylenediamine disuccinate	no	yes
vinegar	yes	no
vitamin e	yes	no
yeast extract	yes	no

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose Dr.Groot if you want Hydrolyzed Keratin in the formula.

Choose Wella if you want this formula as listed.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

Focus on an effect

All ingredientsBrighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plumpCalm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sunGo

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plump

Calm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sun

People also compare

More suggestions →

• Dr.GrootVSDr.Groot J Monsters Shampoo Herbal Citrus 400ml
• WellaVSVisible repair shampoo Londa 1000ml
• Dr.GrootVSDr.Groot J Monsters Shampoo Rosy Musk 400ml

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.