Dr.Ceuracle Royal Vita Propolis 33 Ampoule 30ml vs VT Cosmetics, Red Booster Reedle Shot® 100, 1.69 fl oz (50 ml)
Dr.Ceuracle Royal Vita Propolis 33 Ampoule 30ml and VT Cosmetics, Red Booster Reedle Shot® 100, 1.69 fl oz (50 ml) share 10 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 10Dr.Ceuracle Royal Vita Propolis 33 Ampoule 30ml only 8VT Cosmetics, Red Booster Reedle Shot® 100, 1.69 fl oz (50 ml) only 29
Permalink for this comparison →
Shared formula
21%
- Ingredients in every formula
- 10in both formulas
- Key actives unique to one formula
- 2unique actives
- Ingredient rows compared
- 47rows compared
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
The formulas, row by row
47 ingredients across 2 labels| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Serum · size not on the record | Serum · size not on the record |
| Brand origin | Korean | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Availabilitydiffers | Not recorded | in stock |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | panthenol, niacinamide, centella asiatica extract, sodium hyaluronate | niacinamide, centella asiatica extract, panthenol, arbutin, sodium hyaluronate, ceramide np |
| Free of | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free |
| Heads-updiffers | None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed | pregnancy cautionPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 18 ingredients | Fully parsed · 39 ingredients |
Key actives · 2 | ||
arbutin | no | yes |
ceramide np | no | yes |
Rest of the labels · 35 | ||
ammonium polyacryloyldimethyl taurate | no | yes |
asiatic acid | no | yes |
asiaticoside | no | yes |
caprylyl glycol | no | yes |
carbomer | yes | no |
dextrin | no | yes |
diethoxyethyl succinate | no | yes |
dipotassium glycyrrhizate | yes | no |
dipropylene glycol | no | yes |
disodium edta | no | yes |
ethylhexylglycerin | no | yes |
glycerin | no | yes |
glycine | no | yes |
glycosphingolipids | no | yes |
hippophae rhamnoides fruit extract | yes | no |
hydrogenated lecithin | no | yes |
hydroxyacetophenone | no | yes |
hydroxyethylcellulose | yes | no |
madecassic acid | no | yes |
madecassoside | no | yes |
malachite extract | no | yes |
melia azadirachta leaf extract | no | yes |
moringa oleifera seed oil | no | yes |
portulaca oleracea extract | yes | no |
propanediol | no | yes |
rosa centifolia flower water | yes | no |
royal jelly extract | yes | no |
silica | no | yes |
sodium carbomer | no | yes |
spirodela polyrhiza extract | yes | no |
t-butyl alcohol | no | yes |
tetrahydroxypropyl ethylenediamine | no | yes |
tromethamine | no | yes |
vitamin e | no | yes |
xanthan gum | no | yes |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
The bottom line
Choose Dr.Ceuracle if you want this formula as listed.
Choose VT Cosmetics if you want Arbutin in the formula.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Focus on an effect
People also compare
- Dr.CeuracleDr.Ceuracle Royal Vita Propolis 33 Cream 50g
- VT CosmeticsVT Cosmetics Cica Collagen Eye Cream (15ml / 0.51 fl oz)
- Dr.CeuracleDr.Ceuracle Royal Vita Propolis 33 Eye Cream 20ml
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.