Dr.Ceuracle Recovery BB Balm SPF28 PA++ 45ml vs Scinic Enjoy Perfect Sun Cream SPF50+/PA+++ 50ml

Dr.Ceuracle Recovery BB Balm SPF28 PA++ 45ml and Scinic Enjoy Perfect Sun Cream SPF50+/PA+++ 50ml share 3 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

• 
  Dr.Ceuracle Recovery BB Balm SPF28 PA++ 45ml
• 
  Scinic Enjoy Perfect Sun Cream SPF50+/PA+++ 50ml

Clear allAdd product2 of 8

Permalink for this comparison →

FitFormulaValueUse together

Full comparison

Loading product details…

Full ingredient comparisonLabels, evidence & retailer offers

How much do the ingredient lists overlap?

8%

Ingredients in every formula

3in both formulas

Key actives unique to one formula

3unique actives

Ingredient rows compared

36rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.

How do the ingredient lists differ?

36 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(33 of 36 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side

on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	Recommended Dr.Ceuracle Dr.Ceuracle Recovery BB Balm SPF28 PA++ 45ml $45.90 Reference price Save	Scinic Scinic Enjoy Perfect Sun Cream SPF50+/PA+++ 50ml Save
Basics
Type & sizediffers	Sunscreen · size not on the record	Sunscreen · 70ml
Brand origindiffers	Korean	Not recorded
Offers
Where to buy	No offers listed	No offers listed
Availability	No offers listed	No offers listed
Formula
Key activesdiffers	titanium dioxide, arbutin, zinc oxide	Not recorded
Free ofdiffers	sulfate-free, paraben-free	Not recorded
Heads-updiffers	pregnancy caution · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed	pregnancy cautionPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 36 ingredients	Partially captured — 3 of 5 label entries matched, some checks not run
Key actives · 3
arbutin Pregnancy: caution	yes	no
titanium dioxide Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
zinc oxide Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
Rest of the labels · 30
a silicone	yes	no
adenosine	yes	no
alcohol	yes	no
aluminum hydroxide	yes	no
aluminum stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
bht	yes	no
butylene glycol	yes	no
ci 77491	yes	no
ci 77492	yes	no
ci 77499	yes	no
dipentaerythrityl hexahydroxystearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
disteardimonium hectorite	yes	no
ethylhexyl salicylate Pregnancy: caution	yes	no
ethylhexylglycerin	yes	no
fragrance	yes	no
ginkgo biloba nut extract	yes	no
isoeicosane	yes	no
magnesium sulfate	yes	no
methicone	yes	no
phenethyl alcohol	yes	no
phenoxyethanol	yes	no
polyglyceryl-4 isostearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
propylene glycol	yes	no
silica	yes	no
silica dimethyl silylate	yes	no
talc	yes	no
trihydroxystearin	yes	no
vinyl dimethicone	yes	no
vitamin e	yes	no
water	yes	no

Scinic's label is only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

Focus on an effect

All ingredientsBrighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plumpCalm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sunGo

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plump

Calm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sun

Related formula comparisons

More suggestions →

• Dr.CeuracleVS[MISSHA] M Perfect Cover BB Cream No.25 Warm Beige SPF 42 PA+++ 50ml
• ScinicVSFarmstay PDRN & Vitamin Advanced Sun Cream 50g
• Dr.CeuracleVSMEDI-PEEL Bio-Intense Glutathione White Mela Toning Sun Cream 50g

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.