Dr.Ceuracle Pure VC Mellight Boosting Essence 145ml vs Missha, Vita C Plus, Spot Correcting Concentrate Ampoule, 0.52 oz (15 g)
Dr.Ceuracle Pure VC Mellight Boosting Essence 145ml and Missha, Vita C Plus, Spot Correcting Concentrate Ampoule, 0.52 oz (15 g) share 16 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 16Dr.Ceuracle Pure VC Mellight Boosting Essence 145ml only 17Missha, Vita C Plus, Spot Correcting Concentrate Ampoule, 0.52 oz (15 g) only 25
Permalink for this comparison →
Shared formula
28%
- Ingredients in every formula
- 16in both formulas
- Key actives unique to one formula
- 7unique actives
- Ingredient rows compared
- 58rows compared
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
The formulas, row by row
58 ingredients across 2 labels| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Serum · size not on the record | Serum · size not on the record |
| Brand origin | Korean | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Availabilitydiffers | Not recorded | in stock |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | niacinamide, centella asiatica extract, sodium hyaluronate, ceramide np, ascorbic acid | ascorbic acid, tranexamic acid, arbutin, niacinamide, panthenol, sodium hyaluronate, ceramide np, hyaluronic acid, allantoin, ascorbyl glucoside |
| Free ofdiffers | sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free |
| Heads-updiffers | fragrance allergensPore data not yet reviewed | pregnancy cautionPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 33 ingredients | Fully parsed · 41 ingredients |
Key actives · 7 | ||
allantoin | no | yes |
arbutin | no | yes |
ascorbyl glucoside | no | yes |
cica | yes | no |
hyaluronic acid | no | yes |
pro-vitamin b5 | no | yes |
tranexamic acid | no | yes |
Rest of the labels · 35 | ||
amaranthus caudatus seed extract | yes | no |
anthemis nobilis flower oil | yes | no |
beta-glucan | yes | no |
butylene glycol | yes | no |
caprylyl glycol | no | yes |
chlorella vulgaris extract | no | yes |
corallina officinalis extract | no | yes |
dextrin | no | yes |
dipropylene glycol | no | yes |
disodium edta | no | yes |
eclipta prostrata leaf extract | yes | no |
ethoxydiglycol | no | yes |
ethylhexylglycerin | yes | no |
eucalyptus globulus leaf oil | no | yes |
ferulic acid | yes | no |
fructose | no | yes |
glucose | no | yes |
glutathione | yes | no |
glyceryl glucoside | no | yes |
hydrolyzed collagen | no | yes |
hydrolyzed hyaluronic acid | yes | no |
hydroxydecyl ubiquinone | yes | no |
laminaria japonica extract | yes | no |
limonene | yes | no |
linalool | yes | no |
melia azadirachta flower extract | no | yes |
melia azadirachta leaf extract | no | yes |
methylpropanediol | yes | no |
ocimum sanctum leaf extract | no | yes |
pentylene glycol | no | yes |
phellodendron amurense bark extract | yes | no |
phytosterols | no | yes |
tromethamine | no | yes |
ulmus davidiana root extract | yes | no |
xanthan gum | no | yes |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
The bottom line
Choose Dr.Ceuracle if you want Cica in the formula.
Choose Missha if you want Tranexamic Acid in the formula.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Focus on an effect
People also compare
- Dr.CeuracleDr.Ceuracle Pure VC Mellight A-Tinol Cream 70g
- MisshaMissha, Vita C Plus Ascorbic Acid, Brightening Toner, 6.76 fl oz (200 ml)
- Dr.CeuracleDr.Ceuracle Pure VC Mellight Cream 20ml
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.