[d'Alba] White Truffle Moisturizing Serum Lotion 100ml vs [Nature Republic] Root Barrier Repair Serum 50ml

[d'Alba] White Truffle Moisturizing Serum Lotion 100ml and [Nature Republic] Root Barrier Repair Serum 50ml share 27 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.

Show all ingredients

• 
  [d'Alba] White Truffle Moisturizing Serum Lotion 100ml
• 
  [Nature Republic] Root Barrier Repair Serum 50ml

Clear allAdd product2 of 8

Permalink for this comparison →

FitFormulaValueUse together

Full comparison

Loading product details…

Full ingredient comparisonLabels, evidence & retailer offers

How much do the ingredient lists overlap?

28%

Ingredients in every formula

27in both formulas

Key actives unique to one formula

6unique actives

Ingredient rows compared

98rows compared

From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.

How do the ingredient lists differ?

98 ingredients across 2 labels

Differences only(71 of 98 rows)

Shared ingredients· none here

Product facts and full ingredient lists side by side

on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient	D'alba [d'Alba] White Truffle Moisturizing Serum Lotion 100ml $45.68 $45.68 at Ballagrio ↗Save	Recommended Nature Republic [Nature Republic] Root Barrier Repair Serum 50ml $30.30 $30.30 at Ballagrio ↗Save
Basics
Type & size	Serum · size not on the record	Serum · size not on the record
Brand origindiffers	Not recorded	Korean
Offers
Where to buydiffers	$45.68 · Ballagrio	$30.30 · Ballagrio
Availability	In stock	In stock
Formula
Key activesdiffers	niacinamide, centella asiatica extract, hydrolyzed wheat protein, hyaluronic acid, sodium hyaluronate, panthenol, ascorbic acid, ceramide np	niacinamide, panthenol, sodium hyaluronate, hyaluronic acid, squalane, allantoin, ceramide np, sodium ascorbyl phosphate
Free ofdiffers	sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free	Not recorded
Heads-updiffers	fragrance allergens · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed	None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed
Fit & community
Rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Best for	Not recorded	Not recorded
Data quality
Label coveragediffers	Fully parsed · 69 ingredients	Partially captured — 56 of 145 label entries matched, some checks not run
Key actives · 6
allantoin	no	yes
cica	yes	no
hydrolyzed wheat protein	yes	no
sodium ascorbyl phosphate Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
squalane	no	yes
vitamin c	yes	no
Rest of the labels · 65
angelica gigas extract	no	yes
anhydroxylitol	no	yes
benzyl glycol	no	yes
beta-carotene	yes	no
beta-glucan	no	yes
camellia japonica seed oil	yes	no
caprylyl glycol	yes	no
caprylyl methicone	yes	no
carbomer	yes	no
cetearyl alcohol	yes	no
citral	yes	no
citric acid	no	yes
citronellol	yes	no
collagen extract	yes	no
diglycerin	yes	no
dipropylene glycol	no	yes
ethylhexylglycerin	no	yes
fragrance	yes	no
glucose	yes	no
glutathione	yes	no
glyceryl stearate citrate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
glycoproteins	yes	no
hexyl cinnamal	yes	no
hippophae rhamnoides fruit oil	yes	no
hippophae rhamnoides oil	yes	no
hydrogenated polydecene	no	yes
hydrogenated rice bran oil	yes	no
hydrolyzed barley protein	yes	no
hydrolyzed corn protein	yes	no
hydrolyzed jojoba protein	yes	no
hydrolyzed lupine protein	yes	no
hydrolyzed oat protein	yes	no
hydrolyzed pea protein	yes	no
hydrolyzed potato protein	yes	no
hydrolyzed rice protein	yes	no
hydrolyzed soy protein	yes	no
hydrolyzed sweet almond protein	yes	no
hydroxypropyltrimonium hyaluronate Pregnancy: generally fine	yes	no
isopentyldiol	no	yes
jojoba esters	yes	no
lactobacillus ferment	no	yes
limonene	yes	no
linalool	yes	no
macadamia integrifolia seed oil	yes	no
madecassoside	no	yes
mannose	yes	no
methylpropanediol	no	yes
nicotinamide mononucleotide Pregnancy: generally fine	no	yes
octanediol	yes	no
palmitic acid Fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
pentaerythrityl tetraethylhexanoate	yes	no
phytosphingosine	no	yes
polyglyceryl-10 stearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	yes	no
polyglyceryl-3 distearate Possible fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
shea butter	no	yes
sodium polyacrylate	no	yes
sorbitol	no	yes
stearic acid Fungal-acne trigger	no	yes
sucrose	no	yes
triisostearin	no	yes
tuber magnatum extract	yes	no
water	yes	no
xylitol	no	yes
xylitylglucoside	no	yes
xylose	no	yes

Nature Republic's label is only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.

Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.

The bottom line

Choose D'alba if you want Cica in the formula.

Choose Nature Republic if you want Squalane in the formula.

Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.

This is not medical advice.

Focus on an effect

Focus on an effect

All ingredientsBrighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plumpCalm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sunGo

All ingredients

Brighten & fade dark spotsClear breakoutsSmooth fine linesHydrate & plump

Calm rednessRefine textureRepair & strengthenProtect from sun

Related formula comparisons

More suggestions →

• D'albaVSCentellian24 2026 Newest Madeca Mela Capture Toning Shot Ampoule 30ml*2ea
• Nature RepublicVS[DERMATORY] Nia Shot+ IPMP Black Serum 30ml
• D'albaVSCentellian24 Madeca Vitamin 15 Glowing Serum 30ml

Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.