Ultimate Nourishing Rice Overnight Spa Mask and MEDIHEAL Derma Modeling Pack Madecassoside Blemish share 10 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 10Ultimate Nourishing Rice Overnight Spa Mask only 4MEDIHEAL Derma Modeling Pack Madecassoside Blemish only 46
Permalink for this comparison →
17%
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows. Partial captures footnoted under the board.
| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Mask · size not on the record | Mask · size not on the record |
| Brand origin | Korean | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buydiffers | Not recorded | $25.99 · Kbeautymakeup |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | niacinamide, allantoin | niacinamide, centella asiatica extract, panthenol, allantoin, sodium hyaluronate |
| Free of | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Heads-up | None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed | None flagged from the checks we ranPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Partially captured — 14 of 19 label entries matched, some checks not run | Partially captured — 56 of 76 label entries matched, some checks not run |
Key actives · 3 | ||
cica | no | yes |
hyaluronic acid (salt form) | no | yes |
pro-vitamin b5 | no | yes |
Rest of the labels · 47 | ||
a silicone | yes | no |
algin | no | yes |
artemisia princeps leaf extract | no | yes |
artemisia vulgaris oil | no | yes |
asiatic acid | no | yes |
asiaticoside | no | yes |
calcium sulfate | no | yes |
camellia sinensis leaf extract | no | yes |
centella asiatica leaf extract | no | yes |
centella asiatica root extract | no | yes |
cetearyl alcohol | yes | no |
cetearyl olivate | yes | no |
chamaecyparis obtusa water | no | yes |
cyperus rotundus root extract | no | yes |
dextrin | no | yes |
dipropylene glycol | no | yes |
disodium edta | no | yes |
gardenia florida fruit extract | no | yes |
glucose | no | yes |
glyceryl stearate | no | yes |
houttuynia cordata extract | no | yes |
houttuynia cordata powder | no | yes |
hydroxyacetophenone | no | yes |
iris florentina root extract | no | yes |
juniperus virginiana oil | no | yes |
kaolin | no | yes |
madecassoside | no | yes |
palmitic acid | no | yes |
pantolactone | no | yes |
pantothenic acid | no | yes |
perilla frutescens leaf extract | no | yes |
polyglyceryl-10 laurate | no | yes |
polyglyceryl-3 methylglucose distearate | no | yes |
polyglyceryl-4 laurate | no | yes |
polyisobutene | no | yes |
rosa damascena flower water | no | yes |
sodium benzoate | no | yes |
sodium dehydroacetate | no | yes |
sorbitan oleate | no | yes |
sorbitan olivate | yes | no |
stearic acid | no | yes |
tetrasodium pyrophosphate | no | yes |
trehalose | no | yes |
triethylhexanoin | no | yes |
water | no | yes |
water | no | yes |
xylitol | no | yes |
COSRX and Mediheal have labels only partially captured — rows may grow as parsing completes.
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
Choose COSRX if you want a comparable formula for $13.39 less.
Choose Mediheal if you want Cica in the formula.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.