Pure Fit Cica Serum vs TIRTIR Cica Care Serum 50ml
Pure Fit Cica Serum and TIRTIR Cica Care Serum 50ml share 16 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 16Pure Fit Cica Serum only 4TIRTIR Cica Care Serum 50ml only 25
Permalink for this comparison →
Shared formula
36%
- Ingredients in every formula
- 16in both formulas
- Key actives unique to one formula
- 2unique actives
- Ingredient rows compared
- 45rows compared
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
The formulas, row by row
45 ingredients across 2 labels| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Serum · size not on the record | Serum · size not on the record |
| Brand origin | Korean | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buydiffers | $26.61 · Dodoskin | Not recorded |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | centella asiatica extract, panthenol, sodium hyaluronate, allantoin | centella asiatica extract, panthenol, sodium hyaluronate, allantoin, ceramide np, squalane |
| Free of | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free |
| Heads-up | fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed | fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 20 ingredients | Fully parsed · 41 ingredients |
Key actives · 2 | ||
ceramide np | no | yes |
squalane | no | yes |
Rest of the labels · 27 | ||
beta-glucan | no | yes |
camellia sinensis leaf extract | no | yes |
caprylyl glycol | no | yes |
carbomer | no | yes |
centella asiatica root extract | yes | no |
cetearyl alcohol | no | yes |
coccinia indica fruit extract | no | yes |
coco-glucoside | no | yes |
coptis japonica extract | no | yes |
dipropylene glycol | no | yes |
disodium edta | no | yes |
eclipta prostrata extract | no | yes |
hydrogenated lecithin | no | yes |
hydrogenated polydecene | no | yes |
leontopodium alpinum callus culture extract | no | yes |
pentylene glycol | no | yes |
phospholipids | no | yes |
phytosphingosine | no | yes |
pinus pinaster bark extract | yes | no |
polyglyceryl-10 myristate | yes | no |
polyglyceryl-10 oleate | no | yes |
polygonum cuspidatum root extract | no | yes |
scutellaria baicalensis root extract | no | yes |
sodium lactate | no | yes |
triethylhexanoin | no | yes |
tromethamine | no | yes |
xanthan gum | yes | no |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
The bottom line
Choose COSRX if you want a comparable formula for $19.00 less.
Choose TIRTIR if you want Ceramide Np in the formula.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Focus on an effect
People also compare
- COSRXCOSRX Pure Fit Cica Serum 30ml
- TIRTIRTIRTIR Cica Care Cream 50ml
- COSRXCosrx Pure Fit Cica Soothing Toner Sensitive Skin 150ml
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.