Pure Fit Cica Cream vs VT COSMETICS Retinal Pro Cream 0.05 20ml
Pure Fit Cica Cream and VT COSMETICS Retinal Pro Cream 0.05 20ml share 18 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 18Pure Fit Cica Cream only 8VT COSMETICS Retinal Pro Cream 0.05 20ml only 32
Permalink for this comparison →
Shared formula
31%
- Ingredients in every formula
- 18in both formulas
- Key actives unique to one formula
- 4unique actives
- Ingredient rows compared
- 58rows compared
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
The formulas, row by row
58 ingredients across 2 labels| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Moisturizer · size not on the record | Moisturizer · size not on the record |
| Brand origin | Korean | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buydiffers | Not recorded | $20.00 · Dodoskin |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | centella asiatica extract, panthenol, allantoin, sodium hyaluronate | niacinamide, panthenol, allantoin, retinal, caffeine, centella asiatica extract, ceramide np, sodium hyaluronate |
| Free of | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free |
| Heads-updiffers | fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed | pregnancy caution · photosensitizing · fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 26 ingredients | Fully parsed · 50 ingredients |
Key actives · 4 | ||
caffeine | no | yes |
ceramide np | no | yes |
retinal | no | yes |
vitamin b3 | no | yes |
Rest of the labels · 36 | ||
a silicone | yes | no |
adenosine | no | yes |
beeswax | yes | no |
caprylyl methicone | no | yes |
centella asiatica leaf extract | yes | no |
centella asiatica root extract | yes | no |
ceramide ap | no | yes |
ceramide as | no | yes |
ceramide eop | no | yes |
ceramide ns | no | yes |
cetearyl glucoside | no | yes |
cyclohexasiloxane | yes | no |
diisostearyl malate | no | yes |
dimethiconol | no | yes |
disodium edta | no | yes |
glutathione | no | yes |
hydrogenated lecithin | no | yes |
hydroxyacetophenone | no | yes |
hydroxyethylcellulose | no | yes |
hydroxypropyl guar | no | yes |
macadamia ternifolia seed oil | yes | no |
panax ginseng root extract | no | yes |
pentaerythrityl tetra-di-t-butyl hydroxyhydrocinnamate | no | yes |
pinus pinaster bark extract | yes | no |
potassium phosphate | no | yes |
sodium dna | no | yes |
soluble collagen | no | yes |
sorbitan isostearate | no | yes |
sorbitan sesquioleate | no | yes |
stearic acid | no | yes |
sucrose distearate | no | yes |
thioctic acid | no | yes |
triethylhexanoin | yes | no |
vinyl dimethicone | no | yes |
vitamin e | no | yes |
xanthan gum | no | yes |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
The bottom line
Choose COSRX if you want a comparable formula for $12.25 less.
Choose VT Cosmetics if you want Vitamin B3 in the formula.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Focus on an effect
People also compare
- COSRXCosRx, Cica Cream Intense, 1.69 fl oz (50 ml)
- VT CosmeticsVT COSMETICS Retinal Pro Cream 0.025 20ml
- COSRXPure Fit Cica Cream Intense
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.