AC Collection Blemish Spot Clearing Serum vs Probio-Cica Glow Sun Ampoule
AC Collection Blemish Spot Clearing Serum and Probio-Cica Glow Sun Ampoule share 14 parsed ingredients. Differences highlighted below.
Shared 14AC Collection Blemish Spot Clearing Serum only 7Probio-Cica Glow Sun Ampoule only 30
Permalink for this comparison →
Shared formula
27%
- Ingredients in every formula
- 14in both formulas
- Key actives unique to one formula
- 3unique actives
- Ingredient rows compared
- 51rows compared
From the parsed labels — rows on every label over all compared rows.
The formulas, row by row
51 ingredients across 2 labels| on 2+ labelsonly on this labelnot on this labelIngredient | ||
|---|---|---|
Basics | ||
| Type & size | Serum · size not on the record | Serum · size not on the record |
| Brand origin | Korean | Korean |
Offers | ||
| Where to buy | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Formula | ||
| Key activesdiffers | niacinamide, panthenol, allantoin, sodium hyaluronate, ceramide np | niacinamide, panthenol, centella asiatica extract, ceramide np |
| Free of | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free | fragrance-free, sulfate-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, silicone-free |
| Heads-updiffers | fungal-acne triggerPore data not yet reviewed | fungal-acne trigger · high pore-rating flag |
Fit & community | ||
| Rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Best for | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Data quality | ||
| Label coveragediffers | Fully parsed · 21 ingredients | Fully parsed · 44 ingredients |
Key actives · 3 | ||
allantoin | yes | no |
cica | no | yes |
hyaluronic acid (salt form) | yes | no |
Rest of the labels · 34 | ||
adenosine | no | yes |
aloe barbadensis leaf extract | no | yes |
ammonium polyacryloyldimethyl taurate | no | yes |
betaine | no | yes |
bis-ethylhexyloxyphenol methoxyphenyl triazine | no | yes |
butyloctyl salicylate | no | yes |
dibutyl adipate | no | yes |
diethylamino hydroxybenzoyl hexyl benzoate | no | yes |
dioscorea japonica root extract | no | yes |
dipropylene glycol | yes | no |
ethylhexyl triazone | no | yes |
glyceryl stearate | yes | no |
glyceryl stearate citrate | no | yes |
hydroxypropyl methylcellulose stearoxy ether | no | yes |
hydroxystearic acid | no | yes |
lactobacillus ferment | no | yes |
laminaria japonica extract | no | yes |
lauric acid | no | yes |
lauryl glucoside | no | yes |
phytosphingosine | no | yes |
phytosterols | no | yes |
poly c10-30 alkyl acrylate | no | yes |
polyglyceryl-10 laurate | yes | no |
polyglyceryl-3 distearate | no | yes |
propanediol | no | yes |
propolis extract | yes | no |
rh-oligopeptide-1 | yes | no |
sodium polyacryloyldimethyl taurate | no | yes |
t-butyl alcohol | no | yes |
terephthalylidene dicamphor sulfonic acid | no | yes |
tromethamine | no | yes |
ulmus davidiana root extract | no | yes |
viola mandshurica flower extract | no | yes |
water | no | yes |
Rows come from parsed labels and live offers. Where a label isn’t fully captured, we say so instead of guessing.
The bottom line
Choose COSRX if you want Allantoin in the formula.
Choose SKIN1004 if you want Cica in the formula.
Both lines come from the parsed labels and the prices on this page — neither product is the reference, and neither is called the better one.
This is not medical advice.
Focus on an effect
People also compare
- COSRXCentellian24 Madeca Cream Time Reverse (50ml / 1.69 fl oz)
- SKIN1004SKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Probiocica Glow Sun Ampoule SPF50+ PA++++ 50ml
- COSRXSKIN1004 Madagascar Centella Probio-Cica Intensive Ampoule 95ml
Suggested from shared ingredients on the parsed labels — each pair opens as its own comparison.